 Visitor Reviews |
Arch Linux
|
Reader supplied reviews for Arch Linux
Average rating
9.2 from 229 review(s)
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-08-05
Votes: 22
|
Arch, for me, feels like a builders take on Linux. You start from scratch and build precisely what you want. Like any good structure common sense is needed to make sure it keeps standing. Choosing a limited range of quality materials, staying away from over utilising the AUR. Making sure your choice of software is minimalist and essential with a solid sensible kernel. Then back everything up and make sure you limit upgrades to maybe twice a month.
I have taken this approach. Arch has been as solid Debian with, in my view, better use of more contemporary packages. Its especially good on newer hardware, in a way other flavours of Linux don't come close to.
One word of caution, this is not for conventional users. You must be prepared to put in real effort. Also I'd recommend steering clear of derivatives. I have yet to come across a single one that is more reliable than pure Arch implemented correctly. Indeed some derivatives break the rule of simplicity that defines Arch, which is why they become unstable. Not nonsense about the "bleeding edge". Arch is not bleeding edge, unless you are reckless enough to make it so.
In short, If you are hard working, gain a sense of accomplishment from learning and developing your system your way, you will I suspect quickly come to appreciate just how fantastic Arch can be.
|
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2024-08-01
Votes: 6
|
I've learned more about linux with Arch than any other distro, and I started fiddling with linux in the mid 90's. Being in an windows enterprise environment for all of my carreer, I've always had only enough linux knowledge to barely get by. Retired now, and despising windows Spyware, I started heavily getting into linux about 3 years ago. Arch specifically, about a year ago. It's been a wild ride!
It's gotten to the point that I pretty much won't install any "derivative distros" anymore. Pretty much only Arch and Debian. Rocky being the exception because of what IBM / Red Hat did to Centos.... that said I use Debian mainly for Servers, and Arch for desktops and vms running different DE's or WMs.
Pros:
1. Rolling Release - People question the stability, but I like it better than hoping "LTS upgrades" won't break stuff, and I also install very few AUR packages (on my main system... VMs are a different story). Technically it is also more secure to keep up on latest packages. With zero to few AUR packages, the stability is absolutely fine.
2. The DIY approach and Archwiki - The easiest way to actually LEARN linux. Gentoo and Linux From Scratch are great, but take too long due to compiling. So, Arch is better if you don't want to get into the weeds about learning how to complie source. I'm a systems guy, not a developer, so compiling holds little interest for me, and I want to avoid it if possible. Obviously git packages mostly need to be compiled (like paru), but that's a minimal need to complie.
3. The AUR - Pretty much haven't found a package that isn't on the AUR, and the few that aren't are on Flathub or Git. IMO, a much better approach with an AUR wrapper than, say, adding repos in Debian just to get a specific package. Again, a majority of my AUR installs are on VMs via qemu / virt manager, or on my proxmox server.
Cons:
1. Some packages in AUR aren't maintaned quick enough and break when updating. However, this also presents an opporunity to LEARN how to fix it or work around it.
2. Some package in the main repository gets depreciated or changed, usually breaks one or more AUR packages. Again, an opporunity to LEARN how to fix it or work around it.
3. The Archinstall script (if you use it) often breaks on older ISO images. Even if you try to update the script and mirrors, often there are times when weird things happen on the install... so, it's just easier to get the latest monthly ISO and run the script that came on it.
4. Stock US mirrors for install are fairly slow in my area. I have to run reflector before installing, - easily saving 2/3'ds the time to download the packages for install, even though reflector takes a couple minutes to grab the fastest mirrors.
So, if you really want to learn linux (without compiling), Arch is the way to go!
|
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2024-07-21
Votes: 4
|
Coming from Fedora (personal use) and RHEL (work), I can honestly say that this OS is by far the best Linux distro I have ever used.
I don't care for pretty UIs or gaming support. All I care for is that it fast to install, packages are fast to install, updates are fast to install, the overall OS look and feel is faster than anything I've ever tried except maybe FreeBSD.
I will not be ditching RHEL or its clones for work, but I am switching away from Fedora for personal use.
In the past, I trialled Ubuntu and other Debian clones, but they're all slow and clunky compared to Arch.
I wish the package manager was a bit more robust, but I have yet to scratch the surface of this OS and its innards.
It was a breeze to install on an AMD Ryzen with Radeon Graphics, and intel LAN.
Bluetooth works out of the box, you need to use systemctl to enable it, but it's no biggie.
I picked UFW over firewallD to keep things simple. I also picked Gnome over KDE for simplicity as well.
1Password works flawless on it, and that makes me happy. It's usually a pain to set up on other distros.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-07-17
Votes: 5
|
Arrived with Antergos and now using Arch for over 10 years happily.
I am always convenient on the newest software and with the aur this distro is capable of everything, where others lack support in some cases.
Seldom I have to reinstall, but I'm always prepared for it. In the most cases the system can be repaired easily with the installer image. You know that can happen when you do wild downgrades or tinkering with the system. It never breaks unexpected.
When upgrading to KDE Plasma 6, I needed a new graphics card. That was a rare thing of a drawback of rolling releases. Only update when you may have time to fix it. You will not often need it.
|
Version: current
Rating: 8
Date: 2024-06-25
Votes: 1
|
I'm using Arch for 6 months in a notebook, and the hardware is modern, but weak and I have only 4gb DDR4 ram I wanted something lighter so it does not feel lagging or freezes so I searched for minimal installs, many of them do not have so much packages to work with, some are very good, but it is not so light so I used a minimal install and put some Window manager it does not freeze at all in a i3wm, when it does is because of many tabs in the browser like 10 or YouTube interface who slow down a lot, other videos run better and if is just the file it's flawless.
Using Wayland I notices lagging in animations and memory consumption, also I need to install a polkit agent to work in some Window managers that I used, because it would not start the interface without specially if is Wayland. Another fix is see if the groups that the user is alright in both polkit and seat in case it does not work.
The AUR is a good resource of good applications, but be careful and do not install too much as it can make the system instable as it is not endorsed by arch to work in the system.
The community is very smart and the edgy culture of Arch seem to attract a lot of brilliant people, but they can be somewhat harsh with newbies or assume everybody knew something that feels unhelpful for learning. But their wiki are great even in other distros I use their orientation.
PS: Arch have a way to do not install everything manually first you connect to the internet and test if it's working with the ping command set keyboard layout and insert 'archinstall'
I do not know that so looking at the manual install made me lazy even knowing who to do it, and postponed my installation, but after testing I become more aware of the customization and installed manually to test the differences.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-06-25
Votes: 1
|
Daily driving you!
Thank you Arch for learning me so much about so many aspects of Linux. :)
And yup, other people call it difficult. Or they don't like the terminal/shell. It's not for everyone.
That's fine though!
But for me it's simply a need to have a system that gives me so much room to customize it all myself.
It does that job perfectly. While it does still very much those things that it needs to do. Package manager is really great and simple to use.
Arch wiki is probably the best Linux related piece of documentation on the internet. Especially on how easy to use and read it is. It's very important here.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-06-17
Votes: 0
|
Its a great and exhausting experience. Firstly because you create your OS to your liking but you have to create your OS to your liking. There is no way around it. Even the archinstall script is broken so you have to help it work by manually downloading the archlinux-keyring. But after that not so fun experience you most likely set up an desktop enviroment. Then BOOM ! You will feel a sense of Superiority towards Ubuntu users. In your new System on a clean stake. You go to flatpack and the terminal and pacman and install your stuff your like and setup yay for the AUR. Did i mention the AUR ??? The AUR has what you need, no matter how absurdly obscure. Its like after the post installation steps you have a project and godly toolkit and a manual and help telephone at your desposal. The Wiki no matter into what you do on Linux you will find it in the Arch Wiki its almost a Law of Nature Newton would have find out the moment he gut stuck in the installation because of no Wlan configured. Youll keep wanting to learn more and more. You want to customize more and more. You will make your to your liking tailored OS your Bestfriend till you brick it. Yes Arch is not quite easy to understand but the moment, it ticks ? Youll feel like god like controling everything your PC does, no you actually control everything it does. Every Issues will be a lesson and a test of your humility even when the Arch Superiority complex hits in. You will grow through the pain of Arch. The moment you question something stupid and get ripped to shreds by Pros, youll be motivated to learn more to actually help newbies till you actually become one of the bullies lol. Its the natural Evolution of a Arch user. Arch is the perfect distro for everything. It will become a part of your personality that elitism. I have only used Arch for a week now and have started to sherd newbies on questions after only wasting 8 hours a day for that entire week learning Arch Linux. But most importantly you can say that you use Arch, btw.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-06-10
Votes: 1
|
I'm pretty new to Linux in general since Windows 10 support is ending next year and I have no interest in buying new hardware just to meet Windows 11 requirements. I have a couple months experience after some modest distro hopping (started with Debian, then Endeavour then finally just went to mainline Arch because EOS is really just Arch anyway with a prettier installer). I'm not sure I have much else to add that hasn't already been said about Arch. It's a fantastic operating system. Pacman is fantastic, the documentation is fantastic, and you always have access to the latest and greatest software from the Arch Repo. Most importantly for me is it's a very light install with zero software bloat so I get to choose what I want on my system.
The reputation of Arch proceeds itself, and it is absolutely ABSOLUTELY worth trying. I would like to clear up a couple big misconceptions about Arch though, at least based on my experiences being new to this stuff. First, Arch isn't as unstable as some critics make it out to be. Arch hasn't given me any problems whatsoever so far but I also don't really use the AUR a whole lot. I don't really install a whole lot of stuff any way and I don't have the smarts to be able to properly vet the AUR packages or understand what is in the build scripts. So I just opt to not use AUR unless it's from the developer themselves and only as a last resort for something I really need. If what I need isn't in the Arch repo, I tend to prefer flatpaks over the AUR since I like the containerized packages. I think that if you're using Arch as a daily driver and you don't carelessly overuse the AUR, then problems should be fairly rare.
The second thing people always talk about is the installer. Well there's a dirty little secret.. the live iso actually comes with a fantastic installer script so you don't really have to do a manual install unless you really wanted to. Just type archinstall in the live iso prompt and then follow the steps. So if you're worried about the installation being as hard as people say, don't worry! archinstall is just as easy to use as any calamares installer, but minus the pretty gui. I was up and running in Arch in about ~20 mins or so.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-05-29
Votes: 0
|
Arch Linux is a minimalist, lightweight, and highly customizable Linux distribution known for its simplicity, flexibility, and adherence to the "Keep It Simple, Stupid" (KISS) principle. Unlike many other distributions, Arch Linux follows a rolling release model, meaning that there are no distinct version releases; instead, the system is continuously updated with the latest software packages and updates.
One of the defining features of Arch Linux is its simplicity. The installation process, while not as user-friendly as some other distributions, provides users with complete control over every aspect of their system. Arch Linux installs only the essential components, allowing users to build their system from the ground up, tailored to their specific needs and preferences. This minimalistic approach ensures that the system remains lean, fast, and free of unnecessary bloat.
Another advantage of Arch Linux is its extensive package repository, known as the Arch User Repository (AUR). The AUR is a community-driven repository that contains thousands of additional packages not available in the official repositories. This vast collection of software allows users to easily install and manage applications, tools, and utilities, further enhancing the flexibility and functionality of the system.
Arch Linux also boasts a dedicated and knowledgeable community of users and developers who provide extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources. The Arch Wiki, in particular, is an invaluable source of information for users at all skill levels, offering detailed guides, troubleshooting tips, and best practices for configuring and optimizing the system.
Additionally, Arch Linux offers bleeding-edge software updates, ensuring that users have access to the latest features, improvements, and security patches. This focus on cutting-edge technology makes Arch Linux an attractive choice for enthusiasts, developers, and power users who value staying ahead of the curve and having access to the most up-to-date software.
In summary, Arch Linux's simplicity, flexibility, extensive package repository, active community support, and commitment to providing the latest software updates make it an excellent choice for users seeking a lightweight, customizable, and cutting-edge Linux distribution.
|
Version: current
Rating: 4
Date: 2024-05-18
Votes: 7
|
Arch has its many advantages - namely, new software, great customisability, no random bloatware and a good cmd line. Despite this, its repos (not AUR) are quite stable (unless you use testing, which is marked unstable). Some of the common AUR packages are stable, but I've run into many packages that aren't maintained anymore or lag significantly behind their upstreams.
While the ArchWiki is quite well-informed on a number of topics, it's often lacking in areas that are rather niche (the sort of thing you'd use a wiki for, especially if you were, you know, trying to make the most use of that customisability). Its bleeding-edge update cycle often leaves you with no way to handle old software. It also forces you to use only the package manager to install a number of languages' packages - for instance, Python. So, if the Python package you're looking for isn't in the repos or the AUR, you'll have to start trying workarounds. (PyTorch is not in anything, and you will have to use conda to die trying to get it, and you can't use the older versions.)
Arch doesn't hold your hand and doesn't know what that means, but will bite you with updates requiring you to stay informed about what's going on with the distro's package management. The Archlinux install is unnecessarily difficult due to inconsistencies inside the wiki itself if you're trying to use anything other than the standard setup (/, /boot and swap partitions).
Overall: Works if you aren't really a developer ig. If you need a Linux that breaks once in a while and supports a lot of software (arguably erratically), then you might want to give it a spin. One of the most customizable Linuxes out there, but unless you want to spend a lot of time customising and very little time using said setup, perhaps give this distro a miss.
PS: used this for a decade and it worked alright when I wasn't using it for dev or customising it much.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-05-18
Votes: 0
|
Arch Linux is a powerful and highly customizable Linux distribution known for its simplicity and minimalism. It follows the KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) philosophy, which means it aims to provide a clean, straightforward base system that users can build upon according to their specific needs. This makes Arch ideal for experienced Linux users who prefer to configure their systems from the ground up, choosing only the components they require.
One of Arch Linux's standout features is its rolling release model. This approach ensures that users always have access to the latest software updates and system improvements without needing to upgrade to a new version of the operating system periodically. This continuous update process is facilitated by the Arch User Repository (AUR), a community-driven repository that provides a vast array of software packages, often more than official repositories of other distributions.
However, Arch Linux's appeal comes with a steep learning curve. The installation process is entirely manual, requiring users to partition their disks, configure network settings, and install essential software packages from the command line. This can be daunting for beginners but is rewarding for those who invest the time to learn. The extensive Arch Wiki is a valuable resource, providing comprehensive documentation and troubleshooting advice.
In conclusion, Arch Linux offers a highly flexible and cutting-edge environment for users who are comfortable with hands-on system management. Its rolling release model and extensive community support make it a compelling choice for those seeking a customizable and up-to-date Linux experience. However, its manual setup process and maintenance requirements mean it is best suited for advanced users who enjoy the challenge of configuring their operating system to their exact specifications.
|
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2024-05-03
Votes: 1
|
Arch is a great distro for the desktop if you are ok learning how to do things from a command line. While you totally can use a gui for whatever you want, Arch is designed to teach you Linux admin skills and how to configure and run your system from the command line. The resulting power and control over your system is addictive. It's like the manual transmission in a car, hard to learn but gives you way more power and control once you master it.
For a server distro, Arch tends to update too often to make a usable production server in a work environment. For a personal server, it works fine. I use Radicale to sync my contacts and calendars across all my devices and I use ReadyMedia/MiniDLNA on the same machine (my main desktop) as a DLNA server for my media files.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-04-24
Votes: 1
|
As a long-time user of Arch Linux, I can confidently say that this distribution has become my go-to choice for the majority of my computing needs. The level of customization and control that Arch Linux provides is unparalleled, allowing me to tailor my system to my exact preferences and requirements. Over the years, I've grown so accustomed to the Arch Linux ecosystem that whenever I find myself in a situation where I'm required to use another distribution, I immediately seek out ways to bring a piece of Arch with me. This is where tools like JuNest come in handy, enabling me to continue using my beloved package manager, pacman, and tap into the vast resources of the Arch User Repository, regardless of the underlying operating system.
One of the most remarkable aspects of Arch Linux is its ability to make even the most unconventional tasks surprisingly straightforward. This is largely due to the exceptional quality and depth of the Arch Wiki, a treasure trove of knowledge that covers virtually every aspect of the distribution. Whether you're a seasoned veteran or a curious newcomer, the Arch Wiki is an invaluable resource that guides you through the intricacies of the system, providing clear, concise, and up-to-date information on a wide range of topics.
Moreover, the Arch Linux community is a true gem, comprised of passionate and knowledgeable individuals who are always ready to lend a helping hand. The level of support and camaraderie within the Arch community is truly remarkable, fostering an environment where users can learn, grow, and contribute to the ongoing development and improvement of the distribution. It's this sense of belonging and shared purpose that makes Arch Linux not just an operating system, but a thriving ecosystem that continues to attract and inspire users from all walks of life.
In conclusion, if I were to choose a single operating system to accompany me into the afterlife, there's no doubt in my mind that it would be Arch Linux. Its unparalleled flexibility, comprehensive documentation, and vibrant community make it the ultimate choice for those who value control, customization, and the joy of learning. Arch Linux is more than just a distribution; it's a way of life, and I'm proud to be a part of this incredible journey.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-04-23
Votes: 1
|
Arch is one of those systems that grows on you even if you go in being apprehensive and just want to "check it out".
I did just that, installed it to check it out and a year later my urge to try other distros has diminished greatly.
Arch is fast, it's cutting edge, it's stable, it's as complex or as simplistic as you want to make it, it has an awesome package manager with parallel downloads and a few other tricks up it's sleeve and most of all it's a rolling release. Their documentation is probably one of the best out there. Without going into too many details, I've been using Linux as my daily driver since early 2000's and I've tried every distro under the sun, including the BSD's. I like many different ones for different reasons, but all in all I feel pretty cozy with Arch fulfilling my daily needs and keeping me on the bleeding edge of the Linux kernel and GNU software ecosystem. Thank you Arch devs for all of your hard work, this truly is one of the best Linux distributions in present times and it only keeps getting better.
I hope more people are willing to give it a go and discover how truly awesome Arch Linux can be.
|
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2024-04-19
Votes: 0
|
Love Arch! Its package manager is fast, and it offers modern packages. It's a fun distro for sure, though the usual caveats like upstream bugs and occasional instability apply. Pacman is a very fast package manager – the fastest I've tried. The installation isn't that difficult once you understand how it works, and you can probably learn it in a few days. I wouldn't recommend the archinstall script because it's prone to bugs and detracts from the true Arch experience. Also, if you select the btrfs option within the script, it sets up the filesystem incorrectly without subvolumes, leaving you with more work later. Stick to the old manual installation because it's likely faster than using the buggy archinstall script.
|
Version: current
Rating: 5
Date: 2024-04-12
Votes: 1
|
I did not managed to install Arch Linux with archinstall install script shortly after the initial release of Plasma 6 at the end of february with the March iso because the script tried to pull an obsolete package and would crash with errors because of that. This left me with an incomplete Arch install. I believe this was fixed in the archinstall script with the April release of the iso but it was a painful experience for me. So for an incomplete Arch install I've experienced I'm going to give it a 5. You can skip the archinstall script and install Arch totally manually but since the script is there: please be sure to maintain it more frequently.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-03-31
Votes: 0
|
Perfection! Awesome community, no bloatware... fresh air!
You can learn base of Linux while installing it manually, you'll get better understanding about how Linux system works.
Also you can install packages not in Arch pacman repo with AUR apps like yay or paru. It's really helpful if you want to install a package in github. Rolling release is awesome, you'll get latest updates asap. I recommend using Arch with WM instead of DE, but it's preference after all. If you're new here, looking for a good distro to use... I definitely recommend Arch, also I recommend you to take a look at WM (Window Manager) term. You can take a look at reddit unixporn subreddit, there are a lot of good customizations, also config files... I mean, just search it. And lastly but not least... most of websites running Linux on background and today is sunny so I use Arch btw.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-03-21
Votes: 0
|
Arch Linux: A Playground for Power Users
Arch Linux isn't your average distro. It's a breath of fresh air for those who crave bleeding-edge software, a customizable experience, and a deep dive into the Linux underbelly. But before you dive in, be prepared for a challenge.
Strengths:
Unmatched Customization: Arch gives you a blank slate. You pick the desktop environment (KDE, GNOME, XFCE, you name it) and meticulously craft your system to fit your needs. Package management with Pacman is a breeze.
Rolling Release: Say goodbye to bulky updates. Arch constantly delivers the latest software, keeping your system on the cutting edge.
Lightweight and Efficient: A base Arch install is remarkably lean, making it a great choice for older machines or those who value responsiveness.
Superb Wiki: Arch is famous for its comprehensive Wiki, a treasure trove of knowledge that acts as your guide and troubleshooting companion. The helpful Arch community is another plus.
Challenges to Consider:
Steep Learning Curve: Arch is for users comfortable with the command line. Installation itself is a hands-on experience that forces you to learn.
DIY Troubleshooting: Expect to spend more time tinkering than with user-friendly distros. While rewarding, it's not for everyone.
Not for the Faint of Heart: A broken system due to a configuration error can be daunting for beginners. Backups are essential.
Who Should Try Arch?
Linux Enthusiasts: If you want to understand Linux inside-out and relish the challenge of building your perfect system, Arch is your playground.
Advanced Users: Power users who crave customization and bleeding-edge software will find Arch an empowering choice.
Those Willing to Learn: If you're comfortable with the command line and enjoy troubleshooting, Arch offers a rewarding learning experience.
The Verdict:
Arch Linux is a fantastic distro for experienced users and those willing to learn. Its unmatched customization, cutting-edge software, and lightweight nature make it a compelling choice. However, its DIY approach and steeper learning curve make it less suitable for beginners. If you're up for the challenge, Arch offers a gateway to a deeper understanding and control of your Linux system.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-03-18
Votes: 0
|
Stable and easy to use. Ever since I've started using Arch, I have attracted more potiential dates, however now the local dogs look at me funny. Strong package ecosystem and easy to maintain. No frills. Used for server, media, desktop, and laptop without issues. Using full KDE software suite and both wayland and X11, both PulseAudio and Pipewire -- no issues with either. Works fine with complicated network specifications or AV input configurations without issue. Versitile tool that stays out of the way. Does what you program it to do. You have to accept that you need to understand what you're doing to install it in a secure configuration, then do it because ever since using I started using Arch my bank manager calls me daily thanking me profusely.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-03-17
Votes: 2
|
I came here and expected breakage and issues - that I would have been really happy to deal with, I kinda was promised problems.
Turns out, even on testing branch there are absolutely no issues, even the Plasma 6 release was smooth sailing. Might differ if you need to rely on proprietary crap due to your hardware choices but on open source drivers, all runs well.
The installation process is kinda troublesome but the guided installer or alternative installation methods really make that a non-issue.
|
Version: current
Rating: 1
Date: 2024-03-16
Votes: 1
|
So bleeding edge, we got kde6 before neon. How do I feel being a kde test dummy? Not good man. Wayland makes sure I question all my software. No more window shading or color pickers. At least you can log in to an x session :) No more autodisable touchpad when a mouse is detected. panel icons missing (a lot, using oxygen, the REAL only one lol). Hold on, crash.....ok back. Man, plasma updates buggier than networkmanager. Skanlite still holds record as WAE. Wallpaper still not random. Persistant tooltips, ripped tooltips,useless tooltips (but they got transparencey "/)
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-03-14
Votes: 4
|
After KDE Plasma 6 fell on its face I've did a fresh install moving over to Cinnamon desktop (which I find the most stable). I did try another Arch derivative out of curiosity briefly but nothing comes close to pure Arch. Its simply the most stable OS of its kind, beating out any derivatives I've come across.
Yes a GUI is not there by default but I've become so accustomed now to using the command line to install and configure the OS, not using it feels, oddly, uncomfortable. The command line gives you so much flexibility and puts you in control and better still, it makes you think, so you are very aware of what you are doing.
I keep circling back to Arch and I think there is little chance I'll be going anywhere else. So good in every sense.
|
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2024-03-10
Votes: 2
|
Update to Plasma-6 libs (9.03.24) has broken something again. Now on my dark themed LXQt Kate do not use manually defined icons, so i got dark icons on dark theme. Kdialog stopped using system's theme at all. Predefined systems fonts sizes was reseted to 8 pt, and so on. Previous update of dbus makes system unusable because dbus-broker cannot work with turned off some systemd services. Year ago, afrer Blender update it stoped to work on my system because Blender 4.x requires cpu with sse4.2 that is a x86-64-v2 specs while Arch linux officially runs on x86-64 (i.e. v1). I have noticed updates install more and more dependencies, so bloatedfree distro is more or less questionable now. It is not like i am trying to blame Arch linux. This are what i have noticed recently. Earlier, as i remember it was more stable, at least i did not needed to finish journey of fixing something after almost each update. I have dropped ubuntu/kubuntu years ago bacause of same reasons. Now i am thinking again of less wasted time distro.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-03-05
Votes: 7
|
The freedom embodied in Arch Linux is a testament to the philosophy of simplicity, transparency, and user empowerment. Arch Linux embraces the concept of minimalism, providing users with a bare-bones system that allows for unparalleled customization and control over their computing environment. This distribution adheres to the Arch Way, emphasizing simplicity in design and a do-it-yourself ethos. Users have the freedom to choose and configure every aspect of their system, from the choice of desktop environment to the selection of software packages. Arch Linux's rolling release model ensures that users have access to the latest software updates and features, granting them the freedom to stay on the cutting edge of technology. With Arch, freedom extends beyond the software itself; it's a mindset that encourages users to actively participate in the shaping of their computing experience, fostering a community-driven ecosystem that celebrates individuality and innovation.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-02-25
Votes: 62
|
the best distribution. Only the installation process is bad.
For that, I use EndeavourOS.
The process is simple:
EndeavourOS uses the Arch repo's with some QoL packages in their own repository.
They use KDE Plasma, systemd-boot and dracut by default - also my personal choice.
1. Install EndeavourOS
2. Remove the endeavouros - repo from /etc/pacman.conf
3. Run yay
4. Remove the 10 or so packages that yay lists as "Packages not in AUR"
5. Reinstall lsb-release and filesystem packages with sudo pacman -S lsb-release filesystem (Now your system identifies itself as Arch)
6. Run sudo reinstall-kernels (Now the systemd-boot configs also say Arch instead of EndeavourOS)
7. Check the KDE System settings for possible missing themes/colors and set them to Breeze defaults
8. Reboot your freshly installed Arch system.
Congratulations, you have set up a fully functional Arch system with KDE Plasma in under 30 minutes (depending on your Internet connection)
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-02-14
Votes: 8
|
OS: Arch Linux x86_64
Kernel: 6.6.16-1-lts
Packages: (pacman)
Shell: bash 5.2.26
WM: Openbox
WM Theme: Nightmare
Theme: Yaru-viridian-dark [GTK2/3]
Icons: Yaru-viridian-dark [GTK2/3]
Terminal: gnome-terminal
The Best!!!
No comparison!
Very gentle, simple, smart and wise.
Whatever You want is possible!
Just do everything you want and that's it!
Every time the newest packages.
A huge number of packages.
AUR/YAY.
Almost 3 years using nearby other Linux distroes...
No problems at all!
I'd recommend it to everybody!
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-02-06
Votes: 19
|
Having used Arch now for some years I am still happy with my decision. I would not describe myself as a linux expert. Many nerds would recommend Ubuntu or Mint to me. I tried them of course. But sooner or later those distros broke if I installed something special. And it is hard to say it. Often more painful than Windows in this respect. Centos was much older from its packages but better in stability and performance. And a lot more stable than Windows. So I was back in Linux again. But Centos disappeared after Redhat was purchased by IBM.
After that I gave Rolling Distros a trial because I was not willing to set up my system every 1 or 2 years any more. Tumbleweed was surprinsingly good in performance on my old machines but buggy as Fedora. Really frustrated I even thought about returning back to Windows. But I decided to try Arch. What a clever decision in the end. The installation was a nightmare but managable with the very, very good wikis. After that I never looked back and had absolutely no issues. I am using KDE Plasma. I guess its more than 3 years now with not a single system crash even with a lot of photo editing. Windows crashed 20x minimum in the same time.
Last year I thought I could ruin Arch because I did not update it for half a year. If you do that with Suse Tumbleweed or Debian Sid it will most likely break your system latest after the reboot. Not so with Arch. Absolutely no issues. Pacman is a gem.
When my last windows PC will retire because of Win 10 end of support I will switch it to Arch as well. Systemwise it always was a no brainer. And I am not willing to throw such a fine machine like a HP 8570W to dustbin because Windows 11 is not supporting it and creating us users painful experiences with TPM 2.0 or the potential loss of software or security updates in future.
And linux software has definitely it's advantages over the MS and Mac-World. I hate the new subscription concepts of MS Office, Adobe & Co. companies. Their software might not be bad. But I don't see a huge value of them over the free linux alternatives like LibreOffice, Darktable, Digicam and so on.
The most fascinating experience is that Arch did not loose in performance over the years. It feels snappier than other distros from the first day.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-27
Votes: 13
|
Having daily driven Aptitude-based Linux distributions for years, I decided it was time to move onto better things, and found that Arch had exactly what I wanted that Debian lacked: up-to-date packaging, managed by one of the most intuitive package managers (Pacman).
I also like that I can use the AUR if a package isn't available from Arch officially, which, when combined together, towers over Debian. Not to mention the fact that the Arch Wiki can even apply to distros outside of Arch. It is so well-written and constantly updated for accuracy. Only OpenBSD's manpages rival it, and that's saying a lot.
As it is a rolling release, you do have to use some common sense when applying upgrades. Normally, I wait at least a week before doing an update, which accompanies the routine system backups (which are absolutely important to have, regardless of distro or skill level).
Arch really is amazing all-around.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-26
Votes: 9
|
I migrated from Fedora / CentOS to ArchLinux in 2019 and haven't looked back since then. I started a test migration with my laptop and then moved my desktop and all other computers in the house to ArchLinux.
Fedora and CentOS take too long to provided major version updates to software packages. This is the biggest benefit that I see with Arch and other rolling linux distributions. Although people argue that Arch trades stability for the latest and greatest software, I've never experienced this except once with an Nvidia graphics driver bug.
I use Arch in all my production PCs at home and am happy I made the switch!
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-22
Votes: 14
|
I was really terrified by the rumors that Arch Linux way a distro for andvanced users. This Sundey I had plenty of free time so I desided to give it a try.
The ISO:
The ISO is less than a 1G so the download time was really fast.
The installer:
The installer is text-based BUT it has nothing to do with the complex and confusing text-based installers of Debian or Slackware. It is simple and conenient.
It was as easy as calamares.
You can choose the desktop environment you want to use (KDE,Gnome,XFCE,Cinnamon,Sway,I3,etc)
You can choose if you want your system encrypted.
You can choose the sound server (pulseaudio, pipewire)
And of course you can set language, keyboard, partition and user.
The usage:
Arch have the best documentation out there called "Arch Wiki". It is a very educational manual that teaches people how to follow best practices.
Performance:
I used Gnome and I3. Gnome was performing really good. Almost as smooth as SolusOS.
Software:
Literally every Linux app is available in the repositories or the user repository (AUR).
|
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2024-01-19
Votes: 5
|
Arch is one of those systems that grows on you even if you go in being apprehensive and just want to "check it out".
I did just that, installed it to check it out and a year later my urge to try other distros has diminished greatly.
Arch is fast, it's cutting edge, it's stable, it's as complex or as simplistic as you want to make it, it has an awesome package manager with parallel downloads and a few other tricks up it's sleeve and most of all it's a rolling release. Their documentation is probably one of the best out there. Without going into too many details, I've been using Linux as my daily driver since early 2000's and I've tried every distro under the sun, including the BSD's. I like many different ones for different reasons, but all in all I feel pretty cozy with Arch fulfilling my daily needs and keeping me on the bleeding edge of the Linux kernel and GNU software ecosystem. Thank you Arch devs for all of your hard work, this truly is one of the best Linux distributions in present times and it only keeps getting better.
I hope more people are willing to give it a go and discover how truly awesome Arch Linux can be.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-15
Votes: 6
|
i've been daily driving arch for around 10 months at this point, after switching between Linux mint, Debian and openBSD. After going through the install book. While I have been using Arch it has never broke for me (aside from an issue where I had accidentally installed both pipewire and pulseaudio). While I would recommend something like manually setting up a desktop from a minimalist install, its a pretty good experience.
Pros:
Fast boot speed
Good setup, everything works as expected,
Packages are always up to date.
Everything I want to install is well documented and supported
Gaming works surprisingly well
Cons:
Aur packages are often hit or miss when it comes to installing more obscure things, don't be afraid to use Flatpaks instead
Gpartd on Linux Mint will often refuse to modify my filesystem due to there out of date packages
People can easily forget to deal with pacnew files
All in all, I would recommend this to everyone as there second Linux distro
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-09
Votes: 11
|
At the beginning of December, I picked Arch as my introduction to Linux after twenty-five years on Windows (and a few back way back when on a Macintosh II). I was aware that it wasn't a beginner distro, but I was so badly fed up with everything modern Windows is that Arch's near-opposite philosophy seemed worth some frustration, and life was such that a steep learning curve sounded like an excellent distraction right then.
I have to admit that I'm not sure I'd have managed to get it going without the archinstall script, and definitely not without some embarrassingly basic questions cluttering up their forum. During my first attempts at setting it up on a spare laptop, I got stuck on a problem that I couldn't solve because I couldn't even figure out the right question. (Now I know I'd misunderstood part of the bootloader installation process; six weeks ago I couldn't have told you what a bootloader does.) So I used the script to get the laptop up and running to poke around in; once I was better able to follow the guide and had a better idea of why I might choose one option over another, I reinstalled it, and I've been setting the other computers up manually as well.
I'm finding Arch to be refreshingly straightforward now that the underlying ideas aren't so new; a surprising number of things are so easy to do with the terminal that GUIs are the less user-friendly option for them. Everything's quick and responsive even on the desktop that's been sitting around quarantined as a media archive since the last version of Windows it could run lost support. And it's just plain pleasant to work with; I don't have to fight with somebody else's ideas about what a user's going to want to do and what a user shouldn't tinker with. I don't know how many of these things are Arch-specific and how much are just Linux, but I do know that as soon as the spare laptop was halfway functional, I went a couple of weeks without bothering to start up my usual computer because Arch is such a vast improvement over Windows for everyday use. Maybe it's not a beginner distro, but this beginner is deeply impressed by it.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-05
Votes: 14
|
I have been using Arch for about 10 years now. I enjoy being always up-to-date due to rolling release, Arch's customizability and its light weight. The official package repositories and the AUR contain basically everything one might be looking for and I have found Arch to be incredibly stable despite people claiming it would break all the time.
Its installation procedure might be a bit more difficult without a graphical interface, but Arch is clearly not designed as grandma's first OS. While it is somewhat aimed at advanced users, the Arch wiki has very good articles and instructions, and I would recommend anyone to give it a try at least once. You might fall in love with it just as quickly as I did.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-03
Votes: 18
|
It would be nice if newbies actually used a distro before writing their personal opinion as a "review". For some reason it seems the most targeted here are Arch and Arch-based distros, which newbies perceive as incredibly easy to break. Truth is, Arch is not fragile at all - in fact, after using Debian and Ubuntu for years, I can say with confidence Arch is extremely stable even though it's a "rolling distro", it has been my daily driver for years now. Fixing issues is way simpler than with Debian, where old packages used to cause me all sorts of dependency problems and headaches... Finally, if you're scared and not interested in learning Linux, feel free to use whatever newbie-oriented distro you want, and stop repeating slogans.
|
Version: current
Rating: 7
Date: 2023-12-28
Votes: 0
|
I understand the point of using Arch it is highly flexible and customizable you can make it how you desire without bloat, hence I do not hate it. But there is a reason why it is ranked this low for me, simply the system is the most fragile, even though you can do whatever to your system it is a double edged sword (i.e you can break it easily more on accident). I know the Arch wiki exists and thanks to it I have solved many issues but simply the distro isn't for me, I know why you may want to daily drive it the AUR is awesome tbh. But I am sorry Arch, NixOS is more for me.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-12-26
Votes: 4
|
I've been using Arch Linux for about 12 years. While it used to be problematic with almost every update, last few years it has gotten so stable it is almost boring. Sometimes I feel like I'm running Debian Stable, not Rolling Release distro.
Last problem I had with Arch Linux was about month ago. It was problem with NVIDIA drivers which needed some package to be updated but it was still in testing repo so update failed. This was fixed a day or two later since it was holyday.
Last big problem with Arch was so long ago I honestly do not remember when it was.
One odd thing about arch is pacman - it's package manager. Sintax it uses is way different than what other package managers use, but once you get hang of it, it's as simple as any other.
While Arch Linux is not for everyone, I like thinkering with it, and if sucessfully installed, anyone can use it as any other Linux distro.
Salut from Croatia!
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-12-24
Votes: 1
|
Three years using Arch now. I tried putting a more OOTB kind of distro on a laptop "to save time." I had issues with wifi from the start, and its meta-packages created conflicts. Looking for solutions, the Arch wiki was consistently the best source. It ended up being simpler to install Arch than to try to muddle through with the other so-called user friendly distros. While using the other distro, I had to move to the unstable branch to access software that could build the program I needed to use. The unstable branch began to accumulate a list of programs that the package manager would not install. Arch's rolling release provides continually updated access to software, but in my experience, it is stable and doesn't have weird problems that arise from patching together different repositories, branches, or relying on an unstable branch. After these problems, I moved to Arch. It took an evening to set up and configure. Viva Arch!
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-12-21
Votes: 2
|
And again, just come back to Arch and as always it is just a breeze ! A breeze to simply get what you want and it run at the perfection. Pacman is the greatest package manager I've used, the official repos are very populated, many development tools, IDE, etc. With AUR you have the greatest open source packages collection you can find out there. Finally the wiki no longer needs to be presented even if you are not using Arch, it is full of clear and generic Linux information. Arch is one of these distro that make benefit for all.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-12-07
Votes: 0
|
I discovered and started using Linux in 2004. Since then, I have tried and tested several Linux distributions. Arch Linux has become my home. It's no wonder that arch linux became the basis for many linux distributions. The stability (yes, even though it is a roling release), the pacman package manager, the documentation and the large community, the freedom to customize to the user's taste, the learning and the fact that it is a roling release. There are so many qualities that it would take too long to list and explain them all in detail.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-12-01
Votes: 19
|
Excellent distro.
Once installed, you won't want to leave Arch Linux. I followed exactly the instructions for beginners (without the Archinstall script) from the wiki. It didn't work right away, but after three or four tries, Arch Linux with KDE was installed and runs great and without errors. The wiki is excellent, Pacman also runs perfectly. Installing Arch manually in the console is not difficult at all. I also had openSUSE Tumbleweed installed with KDE in the meantime, but I always end up with Arch Linux, now the distro hopping is over, I have found my distribution with Arch Linux, Arch Linux is perfect.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-11-21
Votes: 0
|
The new install script makes not only installing Arch, but customizing it to your exact specifications a complete breeze! No bloatware, no nonsense, just only what you need. Its no longer JUST for Linux/unix experts. Anyone can customize their OS, as long as they know how to go through an automated checklist.
My main complaint is that systemd is mandatory, and there is no good way to swap it out for a different init system. I wish that they had not overlooked that customizability. I assume that they included it because Arch has some dependencies on it. I hope that changes, because having your OS dependent on a single product with a dev team known for their volatility and disregarding community concerns is...not great. Hate that so many OSs have a dependency on it.
That being said, if you are looking for an OS and you are obsessed with customizing like myself, you can hardly go wrong with Arch. It is the OS that I always return to after distrohopping, and the one I recommend towards anyone that truly wants to make their OS their own.
|
Version: current
Rating: 8
Date: 2023-11-12
Votes: 1
|
If it wasn't for systemd it would have been perfect 10+ but it is being dragged down by IBM-windows-hydra
Limited in scope to those who either understand how a unix/linux system works or those willing to learn and understand. So installation requires a little more learning and reading than most, but once understood it takes minutes without looking at any installation wiki. 3rd parties trying to make an "easier" lazier installer are irresponsible, because installation is the 1st step, and if one was not willing to learn a few things the 2nd step is even more demanding (setup/configuration). So they are a disservice rather than providing help.
The ultimate, fastest, more precise, more flexible package manager and package builder of them all, with really no true competition anywhere in sight.
We wish there was a musl version, and we wish it was officially available for arm64 archs, maybe someday.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-11-08
Votes: 4
|
Once installed, you won't want to leave Arch Linux. I followed exactly the instructions for beginners (without the Archinstall script) from the wiki. It didn't work right away, but after three or four tries, Arch Linux with KDE was installed and runs great and without errors. The wiki is excellent, Pacman also runs perfectly. Installing Arch manually in the console is not difficult at all. I also had openSUSE Tumbleweed installed with KDE in the meantime, but I always end up with Arch Linux, now the distro hopping is over, I have found my distribution with Arch Linux, Arch Linux is perfect.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-10-27
Votes: 7
|
Awesome! i use arch for a few days for user experience with KDE and pacman is very very good.
I install this manually (not using archinstall script) why i installed manually/ if you installing with archinstall you will get chance the file system is corrupt so , better install manually. tip:if you installing manually use cfdisk don't use fdisk (if you use nvme use this command cfdisk /dev/nvme0n1) . you can use custom desktop like XFCE,GNOME,KDE PLASMA,LXQt,MATE,SUGAR,BUDGIE,CINNAMON,LXDE
Keep going archlinux!!!!!!!
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-10-19
Votes: 13
|
It's actually easier than it was a decade ago to create an Arch based distro but things have changed: what I mean by this is that arch iso ships with archinstall which makes the job easy to setup and run arch. I get the best downloading speed with the default mirror. My favorite desktop environment is LXQt. Pipewire is a breeze to have it installed and configured thanks to the archinstall script. I prefer the liquorix (Linux-Zen) kernel over the vanilla default one. An handy thing is to install is informant which prevents updates to be done and packages to be installed as long as you haven't read the Arch News which are very important especially in cases that imply manual interventions. LXQt isn't bloated at all and with openbox as a solid window manager, it's a killer combo. When you look for distros based on project ranking on distrowatch, Arch is the top systemd based distro! Go Arch you won't ever look back ^_^
|
Version: current
Rating: 5
Date: 2023-10-17
Votes: 5
|
I use a couple arch based distros all the time and they are terrific. Pacman is superb. I have been using linux since the mid 90's and I decided to give it another go today. I use slackware currently and a few others but mostly slackware. I always laugh when I do a slack install with the graphical selections to setup your system since it's been like that for decades. Yet it works and you are up and cooking in less than a half hour from scratch.
This OS is deliberately a PITA to install, and it shows. I guess it's some sort of initiation ritual based on the community attitude. Command line partitioning and fstab making is cool, great, but it's not necessary for 25 years. Making public knowledge unnecessarily obfuscating does not make it tribal expertise. It makes it difficult to use. I have better things to do.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-10-15
Votes: 11
|
I have run plain old Arch Linux for over 10 years, and Linux in general for much longer. I distro-hopped for about 15 years before trying Arch, and was hooked from then on. Arch, by itself is only a collection of packages, but add in the freedom to make it anything you want, along with the best documentation to be found in *all* of Linuxland, all together earn it a 10.
I haven't strayed from Arch since I started with it. The freedom it offers is unparalleled. I can't go back to Fedora, Debian, or SuSE. The thought of running anything else but Arch is revolting.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-10-09
Votes: 6
|
I've been using Arch Linux for a while now, and I'm relieved that it's been getting better in terms of stability. The past few months have been smooth sailing, with no bootloader hiccups, which used to be a headache in the past..
While I haven't had any problems with Arch's default init system, systemd, I'd love to have runit as an officially supported option. Being able to test it without having to install Artix would be a huge upgrade.
The only small hiccup I've noticed is that Gnome updates take a bit longer to reach the Arch Linux repositories.
|
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2023-09-28
Votes: 4
|
I've been using Arch on my main laptops for over three years. Its been a better experience than I had expected. Arch is fast, easy to use, if not install and has the AUR with its vast repository of software, that's hard to match. I've had to learn a lot about the command line, using Arch. Yes I've had to trouble shoot issues and not all of them, occasional black screen upon first starting the OS, have gone away, in spite of a lot of time spent on forums.
I do think Arch could do with an automated installer, for those who don't want to be running through things from the command line and I think people need to acknowledge there is maintenance and a few bugs attendant to Arch.
That said, these things are alright as there is a lot of upside too, particularly in terms of gaining independence and being able to set up your Arch OS, as you like as opposed to having a lot of unnecessary software installed by default and having to endure someone else's vision of what your OS should be.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-09-24
Votes: 17
|
Arch is a simple distro that focuses on simplicity and freedom of choice by its users. Its great if you want to completely customize your linux experience.
It has great community which maintains the Arch Wiki that i think is the best knowledge base there is for this moment.
Also it has a amazing package system called AUR, which has a very large collection of software that you can install with ease, almost in 1 command and not having to sit on it for a long time as it would be with another distros.
However, lets talk about bad things arch has, which is not much.
1. It is very beginner un-friendly, i'd say beginner offensive. You'd need to have rather big linux knowledge to use it, let alone install it
2. It forces you to customize everything. Sometimes it would be much easier to let the OS take care of everything
I don't think that any of those 2 things are that bad. If you are a beginner, you will learn one way or another. And the second one is barely a problem, since if you'd want to just use the OS, there is a lot of software like ArchInstall that automates a lot for you. Hell, you can install an Arch-based distro like Manjaro that has all the good things that Arch has, but are beginner-friendly
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-09-13
Votes: 11
|
Arch is a very beautiful distro where everything is for you and by you. You build up everything as per your need . The package management with help of AUR is vast and biggest. It is stable also if you know how to keep it. It is not bloated as you install only what you need. A good configuration will make it the best distro and best OS. I am using this OS for more than 2 years though in between switched to few different Arch based and Non Arch based but again came back to Arch as I feel I have the ultimate freedom only in Arch .
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-09-11
Votes: 3
|
Arch is awesome, I get current packages, I like to update almost daily, and I have had no stability issues. The wiki is one of the best linux help sources for sure. I have been using Arch for a couple years now, but I have been using Linux distros for about 15 years.
Installing was difficult if you follow the install instructions, specially for setting encrypted LVM Disks, otherwise it is pretty straight forward is you are comfortable with the terminal. If not, but it is easy enough if you use the provided ArchInstall program.
Highly recommend Arch.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-09-04
Votes: 4
|
I hadn't used Arch for years. I mostly use my computers for work and I need it to be very stable so I have mostly been on Ubuntu for half a decade or so. I decided to try Arch again and it's been great. You just need to be mindful of what you install on the system and to double check when you do an upgrade for any known issues. So far so good and I hope to be able to stay with it for a long while.
I am on a all MAD system for my main computer so I can't talk about how well the NVIDIA drivers are managed. KDE is my DE and it works great with my multiple monitors.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-09-03
Votes: 7
|
Switched to Arch on all of my computers in the last few months. I never dared to try it out because there is no graphical installer, but finally checked Arch out after reading their excellent documentation and fell in love with it. By following along installation instructions, there is a lot to learn about what graphical installers do for users without them knowing. I actually enjoy setting up Arch on my computers, and overcome challenges like LVM or RAID. Raspberry Pi 4 setup was pretty painless, shockingly easy. Even my rented VPS, with no official support through Arch images, was easy to install when I found out how to boot from custom ISO. Interestingly Arch is doing better there than other distros I tried before, using less RAM and being more responsive. Even my laptop and desktop computer both are happy with Arch and Gnome. It is a bit strange that Gnome Software only handles Flatpak, but offers no support for system packages and updates, but that can easily be handled through Pacman on the CLI. Works for me.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-08-30
Votes: 5
|
The Arch Linux distribution is especially attractive due to its great versatility and modernity. The system consists of a very fast and reliable package manager thanks to Pacman.
Arch Linux is one of the distros of the moment, and it has its reasons for being so. It can be set up to suit everyone, it is a very reliable rolling release, with the latest versions of the applications available shortly after they are published and with a fairly high stability guarantee.
The lightweight and minimalist nature of the Arch is the main reason for its growing popularity in the tech community.
-Incredible universe of applications absolutely anything you need here you will have it and the latest.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-08-02
Votes: 15
|
In a realm where penguins roam the land,
Linux users seeking a distro grand.
Amidst the choices, one stands apart,
A distillation of a hacker's art.
Enter Arch Linux, a system bold,
For those who seek control, it's pure gold.
With rolling release and bleeding edge,
An innovative journey, you'll be led.
In Arch, you'll find a minimalist grace,
A canvas blank, but with power to embrace.
Customization is the sacred creed,
Each pixel and package tailored to need.
Fear not, brave souls, the installation rites,
For through the ArchWiki's guiding lights,
The path shall clear, your doubts dispelled,
A treasure trove of knowledge, unparalleled.
In Arch, you craft a system your own,
From the base you build, like a cornerstone.
Unencumbered by bloat, it runs fleet,
A snappy response to your commands' beat.
Updates flow like a river's course,
Refreshing software with seamless force.
No version jumps, no system break,
A rolling journey, ever awake.
An AUR of wonders, a repository vast,
Community-driven, a voyage to last.
A plethora of packages at your command,
In this expansive realm, nothing is banned.
From servers to desktops, it scales with ease,
Across the spectrum, it aims to please.
For the seasoned user and the daring new,
Arch Linux beckons, ready to imbue.
Embrace the challenges, for they are the key,
To understanding Linux, truly set free.
So come forth, join the Arch brigade,
Where innovation and adventure never fade.
With Arch Linux, you'll find your way,
In this open-source world, where passions play.
A journey unique, a story to tell,
Why choose Arch? The answer is clear as a bell.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-08-01
Votes: 0
|
Arch Linux is an absolute gem! As a bleeding-edge distro, it consistently keeps me at the forefront of technology, providing access to the newest and most innovative software. The ease of customization is truly remarkable, thanks to its minimalist design and the wide array of software available through the Pacman package manager + AUR. Being community-driven, it embraces the true spirit of Linux, untainted by corporate influence. This pure Linux bliss is a testament to the hard work and dedication of the authors and contributors who have crafted this remarkable distro. My heartfelt gratitude to them for making Arch Linux an exceptional experience!
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-07-31
Votes: 0
|
THE BEST
The independently developed x86-64 general-purpose Linux distribution Arch Linux really provides the latest stable versions of most software with only a regular system update due to its rolling-release model.
The package manager for Arch Linux Pacman handles package installation, upgrades, downgrades and removal with great ease along with automatic dependency resolution. The packages are obtained from the Arch Linux package tree and are compiled for the x86-64 architecture.
Arch Linux is the best Linux distribution so far with a mildly difficult installation process for beginners.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-06-13
Votes: 0
|
iam a bit new to linux but arch has been way more user friendly to me then ubuntu debian and fedora, with archinstall i could customise my system how i want and it was always updated. AUR and Pacman was usefull and not broken and bad like apt and dnf. and arch has been very minimal at usage of ram and disk space while other distros waste it mostly. thank you arch for existing and also. I use arch btw.
pros:
always updated
u can do what ever u want with it
very customizble
aur is the best package manager
cons:
some stuff might be broken after a update sinse they are very frequent and some stuff cant keep up
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-05-28
Votes: 0
|
stable, customizable, like it, just u need to guide the manual or tutorials to install this OS, but no problem
why i recommend this distro:
1. very customizable
2. for programming
3. its stable
desktop enviorement recommended for me: kde plasma
like a advanced distro i dont recomend this distro for a newbies users, but if u want download it, just check the manual
pros:
1. u got all control from the distro
2. when u need to install a package, the wiki has all of u
3. for comunity to the comunity, so u get so documental in the oficial page
but:
1. hard to install, but they we have tutorials and the wiki
2. bad update and u brake the system
in conclusion: RANK A
its so recomendable for advanced users, but if u are newbie, its so hard to install this, i recomend if u are newbie this distros: manjaro, endeveaur and garuda, but if u are advanced and u need a pure experience, this distro is for you
thanks for reading :)
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-05-20
Votes: 4
|
Ah, behold, the magnificent Arch Linux, a distro that elevates my digital existence to unprecedented heights. As a connoisseur of the intricate intricacies of the technological realm, I am well-versed in the mystical arts of Linux, and thus, my tryst with Arch Linux was a foregone conclusion. Permit me, dear readers, to regale you with my grandiose account of this unparalleled experience.
Arch Linux, with its ethos of simplicity, beckoned to me, drawing me inexorably into its esoteric embrace. A meticulously crafted masterpiece, it demands not the feeble acquiescence of the technologically illiterate but rather the unwavering resolve of the cognoscenti. A pantheon of sophisticated tools awaits the noble user who dares traverse its perplexing labyrinth.
From the moment of installation, Arch Linux elucidates its immutable dominion over mere mortals. An inscrutable command-line interface, bedecked with enigmatic commands and cryptic syntax, invokes a sense of awe and reverence within the enlightened few who dare invoke its powers. One must navigate a treacherous sea of documentation, replete with obscure jargon and arcane rituals, to bestow upon oneself the divine gift of Arch Linux.
Once ensconced within the hallowed realm of Arch Linux, the majestic simplicity of its package manager, Pacman, is laid bare. With unassailable command, it scours the annals of the vast repositories, procuring the most coveted software artifacts with effortless grace. Dependencies are but pawns in Pacman's game, effortlessly sating the voracious appetites of my technological desires.
And lo, the true beauty of Arch Linux lies in its ethereal customizability. It bestows upon me, the noble user, the power to mold and shape the digital universe according to my mercurial whims. The delicate symphony of the X Window System, choreographed by the maestro-like expertise of the Arch user, weaves a tapestry of aesthetic delight across the vast canvas of my screen.
Yet, I cannot ignore the pitfalls that beset the path of Arch Linux disciples. The fragile edifice of this distro demands constant vigilance and the dexterity of a seasoned acrobat. The faint of heart shall stumble upon the precipice of frustration, as frequent updates challenge their very resolve. Only the stalwart and unwavering may bask in the glory of a well-maintained Arch Linux installation.
In conclusion, dear readers, Arch Linux stands as a towering colossus amidst the mundane hordes of mainstream distros. Its formidable learning curve and elegant simplicity shall both humble and exalt those brave enough to venture into its mystical embrace. It is a distro for the intellectuals, the artisans of technology, the connoisseurs of digital enlightenment. With Arch Linux as my beacon, I navigate the digital cosmos, radiating an aura of superiority, secure in the knowledge that I am among the elite few who have unlocked the true essence of the Linux experience.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-05-17
Votes: 1
|
The best.
I tried most of the major linux distros, and arch linux just works. Very fun and easy for daily use and work. Install is also super fast now with the built in scripts. Pacman, AUR are also amazing. The rolling release on arch is very fast and very good, even better than opensuse tumbleweed in general, no need to worry about anything breaking at all. Arch linux along with the Sway tiling window manager is the unbeatable setup in 2023! The Arch Wiki is so good that you can find anything on it and its super clear.
|
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2023-05-03
Votes: 5
|
Reviewer:
Experienced user, Linux, BSD, MAC, Windows, DOS, CPM, etc
2nd review (follow-up), on Arch, first review was favorable on an initial user's experience, now a couple years later, still impressed using the system.
In general, the installation is poor for beginner, satisfactory for experienced, the operating system is good overall. Using Mate desktop (gnome2 fan)
Pros:
Very good, stable operating system, installed on 10+ systems. Hardware ranging from over 10 years old to modern.
Even with the constant updates available, have not experienced any issues overall. The ability to acquire advanced features of software, I opted transitioning from Debian due to issues with repositories after systems ran for years. Debian upgrades did not always go smoothly, starting over was time consuming and disruptive.
I don't recall experiencing a failed system update (rolling system updates), rarely reboot, with systems running months or more.
In my experience, a headless Arch server has only been restarted in once in 2 years due to a 3 day power outage.
Backups, cloning, and replicating is where the Arch systems really shine, transitions from one drive to another, one system to another are smooth. I can clone a clean system, or a fully configured system in minutes (via rsync). This is my primary reason using Arch, maintaining the spouse's computer became trivial.
Aside upgrading, cloning, and backups, Arch is comparable to running Debian or similar. Arch is best suited to someone experienced in Linux, for installation, once administered, anyone can use it. It is very trim & lite when first installed.
Latest system install from scratch, System 76 Pangolin 12 (just release at time of review), installation was a little rough due to operator being rusty, once installed experienced crashes and lockups for the first few days, but has been running stable for a few days now after various firmware and driver updates.
Boot time is 2 to 5 seconds on a fast SSD drive, operating system running well with heavy loads, several virtual machines, many browser tabs, etc.
(Drivers and firmware was not an Arch issue)
Cons:
Installation was a bear (first time), learning curve steep, too many choices for a beginner, I recommend Debian for a beginner, far easier. I had just recently installed on a new laptop (for fun), and still was tripped up on the many steps to know, requiring a second system to look up information. On a positive note, I know there is work going on for helpful scripting to ease the pain.
Forums - Before I used Arch, I found a wealth of general Linux help on the Arch forums and users were helpful. This is what actually encouraged me to try Arch. Lately I see forum members scolding beginners referring to "Reading the manual", "Not going to help" in response to help requests. I fail to understand why someone would bother to deter another user, rather than help, I find this behavior should be discouraged by admins and moderators.
Updates become frustrating at times, some systems are updated less frequently (don't fix whats not broken), only to find everything is out of sync. Not a show stopper, but frustrating when trying to install a minor app or tool, only to have to update the system. Admittedly, I know this is the philosophy, and it doesn't take that long to update. Fortunately, the repositories are usually in very good shape, and fixes are fast.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-04-29
Votes: 1
|
This is the best linux distribution available for linux power users. I have been on it since 2011 and absolutely love the speed, power, simplicity and customizability it provides. ArchWiki and the arch forums are a goldmine of information. Right from installation from scratch to solving any driver compatibility issues, search for it and you will either find a page on the wiki or a thread in the forum, given the large community of linux power users using Arch. It boots fast, installs packages really fast and keeps itself and all the applications always updated, so you don't have to worry about being on old versions of popular applications.
AUR is beyond compare with most probably the largest repository of software available for linux. Any program not vetted and put in main channels can be found there and be easily installed with a helper or by hand using makepkg and pacman -U.
This is a gift to humanity.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-04-27
Votes: 3
|
Arch Linux is a very fast booting and performing distro and has a boot time of around 15 seconds on a normal HDD. The installation process might be a bit hard for newbies but after one or two tries you get used to it.
The pacman package manager is fast and provides all the info someone might need. But installing something from the AUR is painful if you don't have a AUR helper like yay or paru, and I think that functionality should be included in pacman just like paru does it. And the AUR has another problem: Some packages only have source releases, and no binary ones. Fortunately most packages either have them or you can just use the Chaotic AUR for that.
And the last thing I want to mention is that if you have a problem that you most likely get a result either from the Arch Wiki or the Arch Forum. So even if you have a extremely rare problem, there probably already exists a solution in the Arch Forum or Wiki. Atleast that's my experience.
|
Version: current
Rating: 6
Date: 2023-04-06
Votes: 5
|
When I was using Arch, I did enjoy it. The simplistic nature of the packages with little to no dependencies is nice. No dependency hell. The community run project with no cooperate backing to force a direction can be a benefit for many. You choose what you want to install.
But there are downsides. The AUR while nice, is just a big git repo where you have to compile. Half of the stuff won't build and it can lead to packages break. Also, printer drivers from brother don't support Arch Linux and when you can't find it from the AUR, you're expected to build it yourself. The community is just ugh.
|
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2023-04-06
Votes: 1
|
I've learned more about linux installing Arch than I have being a "big distro" user since 2007.
The wiki is outstanding. And the feeling of starting from nothing and putting it together yourself is gratifying.
It's kinda like the software equivalent of building your own PC by buying the parts.
I'm a relatively new user & haven't experience any instability issues yet.
Although I am always prepared for it.
Having to manually install & update using AUR for some packages doesn't feel all that nice.
Seems like it takes a lot of effort to get something included in the official or community repos.
Still, all-in-all. It's makes your system feel unique and your own.
It's been my favorite distro thus far despite the extra bit of manual maintenance.
|
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2023-03-28
Votes: 0
|
Arch Linux is the fourth distro I have used and the second that I have used for more than 15 minutes(I have been using it for about 4 months). Manjaro was the first I used for an extended period(about 3 months before I switched to Arch). Arch Linux is there for people who enjoy trying new software and don't mind having to do some work on the system now and then.
Software is plentiful in Arch repositories. If a package is not in the repositories it is usually in the AUR. If it is not in either of those you probably do not need it. The official repositories include several browsers, Steam, most of the major DEs and WMs, 4 Linux kernels, and much more. Mojang provides an official AUR package for the Minecraft launcher. The PKGBUILDS provided by each AUR package should be read before building or installation.
The documentation is very good with the wiki being considered one of the best. There is a wiki page for almost anything you could ever want to do on your system.
Installation is not as hard as it seems but it is quite easy to mess up. However, your trusty archiso can allow chrooting into your broken system to fix it.
While updates occasionally break the system, the Arch team usually posts notices to the archlinux.org homepage of these breaking updates as well as steps to fix the problem.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-03-19
Votes: 0
|
If someone is looking for a distribution that allows a lot, and at the same time is quite easy to use, then Arch Linux is the perfect choice.
And this AUR - a revelation!!! It's like a flatpak, only in a more developed form.
All in all, Arch is what we're all looking for :)
If someone is looking for a distribution that allows a lot, and at the same time is quite easy to use, then Arch Linux is the perfect choice.
And this AUR - a revelation!!! It's like a flatpak, only in a more developed form.
All in all, Arch is what we're all looking for :)
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-03-02
Votes: 1
|
Installation can be a bit difficult (specially for newbie), but once you undestood how install it's always the same procedure, so you can setup an Arch system from USB to DE in about 15/20 minutes. There's also archinstall, which semplifies the installation process by guiding it.
I always install Arch on my pcs because it's leaving me the freedom of doing what I want with my system, without installing apps that I don't need, pushing packaging systems that I don't want or deciding if i need codec or drivers or not.
Not talking about AUR, in which you can find everything that can comes to your mind. If something it's not in the AUR, you can both create your own AUR package, helping who, like you, needs this particulary package, or compile it directly from the source (like every distro).
On old or slow computer I feel almost obbligated in installing Arch: even with KDE or GNOME, the most heaviest DEs, it runs smoothly even if the pc has 4gb of ram and HDD. Setting zram up is really easy if you need it, and if you use archinstall, this will be done automatically if you setting it in the installer.
Some years ago, Arch could be considered as an "elite" distro. But today I think it's ready to be mainstream. Yeah, even with archinstall it's not simple as Ubuntu or Fedora or other mainstream distro, but it's a good alternative for who want to learn something while configuring what the system needs
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-02-26
Votes: 0
|
As a AMD Radeon graphics card user, arch has been a blessing. Fast and reliable updates, on a desktop that i can setup myself from scratch that provide me with great performance and access to the huge library of arch and arch user repositories. You will be hard pressed to find a linux package that is not available on arch in one way or another. Furthermore it is easy to setup all the required software for gaming, especially through steam, and i am glad to say that pretty much my entire library is playable now.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-02-17
Votes: 1
|
I hadn't used Arch for years. I mostly use my computers for work and I need it to be very stable so I have mostly been on Ubuntu for half a decade or so. I decided to try Arch again and it's been great. You just need to be mindful of what you install on the system and to double check when you do an upgrade for any known issues. So far so good and I hope to be able to stay with it for a long while.
I am on a all MAD system for my main computer so I can't talk about how well the NVIDIA drivers are managed. KDE is my DE and it works great with my multiple monitors.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-02-16
Votes: 2
|
I have been using Arch as my sole operating system on both my notebook and my main computer for many years.
In all these years I have no problems with the rolling release model. In only very rare cases something has to be changed manually, and the Arch homepage provides exemplary information about any necessary interventions.
I appreciate the always up to date software, which comes quickly into the pact sources after it has passed the test phase. So you are always up to date and do not have to wait until a new release comes out. In addition to the official sources, you can also find many other programs via AUR that you may need in addition. Again, I have never had a problem with a package. The system can be installed individually and runs very fast. I can therefore recommend Arch without reservation.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-02-08
Votes: 0
|
The performance that I manage to get out of my old Machines with Arch is simple outstanding and I am amazed of how easy is to setup everything.
I love how lightweight it feels compared to every other distro of linux i Tried.
And pacman + aur is just something that you don't have to leave and open a browser to search for unsense stuff ever.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-02-03
Votes: 1
|
Kiss Kiss Kiss! Runs fast; bleeding edge, stable though (OK, may be not as much as Debian stable, but more than enough for everyday personal and professional use)
I have been wandering though many linux distributions: starting with RedHat 5.2Apollo in 1998, then rpm-ish Mandrake/Mandriva, Fedora, Centos or apt-ish Debian, Ubuntu, Mint; also tried (open)Suse. Unitil I met arch linux nearly 10 years ago. I never moved since. There is now no good reason to do so.
Pros: lightweight, pacman (+yay/aur extensions), archwiki and the community, CLI install (yes, it's in the pros)
Cons: the Arch logo
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-01-25
Votes: 1
|
I have tried many flavours of Linux over the last 20 years or so, usually running multiple versions mapped to use the same data discs for documents, media etc. Having come from a Unix background I'm not afraid of the command line, but do prefer a GUI these days.
I still run multiple versions (currently Arch, Debian Testing, Fedora 37) on multiple machines all running the Cinnamon desktop (another extended evaluation exercise), but Arch has been my default distro for ~10 years now.
Pros:
- New Kernels and Nvidia drivers are released at the same time these days, meaning no compatibly issues, unlike others!
- Fast boot and running
- Stable (but I do have LTS installed as well just in case)
- Pretty pure, i.e. very little customisation of upstream packages which helps stability and speed of release of updated packages
- Use of non-free software much less painful than many distros
- Wiki - simply the best Linux documentation and a lot of effort goes in to keep the information current
- Can install exactly what you want, no more, no less
Cons:
- Command line install requires concentration and accuracy, but can get to a GUI in about 30 minutes after lots of practice
- No GUI installer
- The pacman GUI in the repository (apper) does not cater for packages in the AUR
|
Version: current
Rating: 7
Date: 2023-01-12
Votes: 2
|
While Arch can be a desktop "distribution", I think of it more as a server installation. For a server, you just need a terminal and SSH (along with the traditional server software: nginx, php, mariadb or other SQL flavor).
As a server installation, I would rate Arch 10/10. It's awesome for that. I downgrade it for desktop installations because it is cryptic. You can do most everything you can do in any other distro, but sometimes it can take a bit of troubleshooting when things go weird.
The learning curve is steep, but the good news once you learn it most will apply to other distros. You may even feel like creating your own (lol).
All in all, it's not as steep of a learning curve as "linux from scratch".
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-01-10
Votes: 11
|
Arch Linux is my distribution of choice due to the fact that it is the only current distribution which offers almost all the things I want from and like in a Linux distribution.
Pros:
* Rolling release makes it very easy to upgrade packages.
* Vanilla packages giving the intended original experience.
* Latest packages are available very quickly after the release.
* Possible to customize the distribution to your liking.
* Excellent documentation.
* Community support.
Cons
* Initial learning curve can be time consuming.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-01-09
Votes: 0
|
I have built hundreds of Arch systems.
My own has been migrated over dozens of different computers since 2007 by dumping package lists, home directories and configuration files and restoring them to the new system.
IMO the toughest part of installing the current Arch is setting up a boot loader.
The biggest con with running is that sometimes there are dependency issues after upgrades. I usually just roll back the image and wait a few days for a documented fix.
I can't see another distro replacing it for me.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-01-09
Votes: 0
|
Yes I have Installed Arch the Arch way, have also used the command line installer. Can it be a but frustrating yes but that is why they say RTFM. Yes there is A lot of reading but there Wiki is hands down the most useful wiki even for os's not based on Arch. It's even helped with this dell that has been a thorn in my side since day one. The duel AMD graphics which should automatically switch when under a heavy load and it doesn't. Fortunately for Steam all I do is start in the terminal with a DRI_PRIME=1 steam and all my games run using the discrete. None of which I had gotten from the Dell website.
|
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2023-01-09
Votes: 0
|
I had some problem to setup my old NVIDIA card, on an Optimus laptop.
Bumblebee, prime, stuff from AUR, too many rebuilds.
With dual kernel installation (latest and LTS) every upgrade took a lot of time rebuilding DKMS modules.
But my laptop was rather old.
Now, with EndeavourOS I kept default Nouveau that supports Wayland on my old card.
In the past also tried Mannaro, that looks cool at time, but became soon a strange thing (a ubuntu-arch beast),
with version incompatibilities an among (older) official downstream and AUR repo.
I first installed Arch many years ago. I remember how I felt proud of my WiFi network setting, then I rolling upgraded until last year when my HDD surrendered.
Having an heavy setup procedure and a rolling upgrade, can leave you in your "Arch confort-zone", with distant memories on old setup procedures.
An example was new EndeavourOS setup that was btrfs/Wayland out of the box
I use "paru" instead of "yay", but I do not remember why (rust/go?)
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-01-01
Votes: 2
|
one of the best linux distros out there.Installing it is a tremendous learning experience.It is upto the end user to make the distro as per their wish.It does have a learning curve but at the end of the day it is well worth it.The customizability it offers is second to none.It offers all the latest bleeding edge software and nearly every software can be found in Arch User Repository (AUR) if not the main repositories. It also supports various file systems such as ext3, ext4 , btrfs ,zfs , etc.
|
Version: current
Rating: 1
Date: 2023-01-01
Votes: 0
|
I am a long-time Linux user. Actually, I started with openSUSE Linux in 2005. Since then, I have worked with several different Linux distributions. In the last 6 months I tried Arch Linux times in different versions and now. The installation of the multimedia codecs never worked as documented! Always some transitive dependencies are missing. The conflict resolution of pacman also does not really help here. For this reason, I can not recommend Arch Linux as a desktop operating system. Sadly. Arch Linux, please solve that multimedia codec mess and don't release an operating system when multimedia codecs don't install without errors...
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-01-01
Votes: 0
|
I had trying a lot Linux distros. There is no such thing like a perfect distro for me, but there are less trouble distros and Arch one of them.
For example if you forgot to install net-tools or network manager you could boot from arch iso, mount rootfs to /mnt and pacstrap required packages. There is another way, you may play with chroot and console's package manager but this requres a little bit more actions (yah, this works for any Linux).
It's rolling and even if it formally may be an equivalent to unstable for LTS like manner, frankly it is more stable than a lot of LTS type distros (Ubuntu, Mx so on).
My previous Arch installation was about 7 years ago. It still works until now but I decided to reinstall it.The cause is old configs for some packages that may be less actual after a thousands updates and may lead to performance impact. In fact a fresh installed Arch on old pc (lga775 mb with 771 mod, Xeon, ddr2 mem, ssd, nvidia+prop. driver) same fast for regular tasks as my xps 15 9560 notebok. Arch is one of the fastest.
Pros:
+ bleeding edge / rolling-release
+ fast runing / very fast installation in compired to most debian based distros ( parallel package downloads / fast package manager )
+ stable enought for user pc
+ AUR
+ wiki.archlinux.org
+ ffmpeg with turned on hw-encoding. There are a lot of educational videos available on internet, but most of them boring and lead me to sleep. So i transcoding it to highter speed and watch later on tablet. hw-encoding save a lot of time and some space. (By the way some video players may change playing speed, but moust of them make speech non understandable)
Cons / Pros:
- / + reqires some expiriense and knowledge, even if you don't have it you will get it, partially during install and tune. There are some installation scripts even a pseudo-graphic one exists and you may use it for fast start with Arch but during use system you will turn to console for administration things after all.
- / + systemD, mostly i do not care of systemD hollywar, but a no-systemD distros react a little bit faster when difference only on init systems
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2022-12-14
Votes: 0
|
Because Arch is the best linux distribution.
Pros:
+fast.
+easy to use.
+like vanilla.
+powerful package manager.
+if you like control over operating system Arch is for you.
+low hardware requirement.
+completely customizable
+good documentation.
+you get a better understanding of how Linux works.
+rolling release(I like rolling release instead of LTS)
+Arch Linux is one of the rare few community-only Linux distribution projects.
Cons:
-not for newbie user.
-if you don't have much time for configuration stuff not for you.
overall very good linx distro
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2022-11-20
Votes: 0
|
Pros:
+ lightweight (low hardware requirements)
+ customizable (not just how it looks!, you can customize almost everything)
+ fast package manager with expansive AUR
+ great wiki and documentation
+ great way to learn about linux and its internal workings
+ much simpler to install now with archinstall
+ bleeding edge software and fast updates
+ easy to "rice", if you're into that sort of thing
Cons:
- not great for beginners that don't understand a lot of the basics of installing a linux system (partitioning, filesystems, bootloader, etc)
- very terminal-centric, could be a turn-off for some
- requires a lot of initial effort to get started and a little more effort to iron out issues later on
Overall, a 10/10. I daily drive Arch on both my home PC as well as my laptop for schoolwork. I find that it works fine on both use cases and isn't too harsh on battery life.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2022-11-13
Votes: 0
|
Because Arch is the best linux distribution.
Pros:
+fast.
+easy to use.
+like vanilla.
+powerful package manager.
+if you like control over operating system Arch is for you.
+low hardware requirement.
+completely customizable
+good documentation.
+you get a better understanding of how Linux works.
+rolling release(I like rolling release instead of LTS)
+Arch Linux is one of the rare few community-only Linux distribution projects.
Cons:
-not for newbie user.
-if you don't have much time for configuration stuff not for you.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2022-11-11
Votes: 0
|
I'm using Arch for over a decade now, mainly on Laptops. Whatever I had to learn about Arch, be it the installation process or be it how to maintain it: It was a one time investment and I never regretted it. Coming from Windows (since Version 2) and many other Linux distros (my first one was a SUSE Linux 4.2) I was looking for a distro that suited my needs. Minimal, fast, KISS, easy to maintain (without the need to care repeatedly about broken dependencies), with good and extensive documentation, with a large and helpful community and finally bleeding edge. Arch brought everything to the table and so I still stick with it.
If you are a somewhat experienced Linux user who prefers to spend his/her time using the machine rather than maintaining it (or fixing broken dependencies), then you are in good hands with Arch Linux.
Pros:
+ fast
+ stable
+ easy to maintain
+ KISS principle (Keep it simple, stupid!)
+ powerful package manager (pacman)
+ extensive software repository
+ very good documentation (english wiki)
+ large and helpful community
+ Linux self education (RTFM, Learning by mistakes -LBM-, Learning by doing -LBD-)
+ bleeding edge
Cons:
- not for beginners or unexperienced Linux users (especially GUI-fanatics)
- non-standard AUR (Arch User Repository) packages can be a pitfall. Be cautious!
Absent aunt edit: typos for sale! (/ironyoff)
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2022-11-05
Votes: 0
|
Pros:
1. No bloat - control what you install, with minimal core features to start with
2. Cutting edge packages
3. Documentation
Cons:
1. Aur can lead to some inconsistencies for some packages
2. Sometime more hand work required for some packages installed from outside of official repositories
It can be difficult to install and maintain for newbies, but still much easier than LFS or Gentoo.
I like it does not rely on sandboxes like snap (you can install them but not pushed to do that, like in some other distros),
Cutting edge packages means I can more efficiently support my cutting edge hardware.
Overall, even at some cons - solid 10
|
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2022-11-03
Votes: 5
|
I migrated to Arch KDE after 3.5 years on Manjaro. The constant problems with the conflict between Manjaro's packages and the AUR, in part, prompted the move. Its been six months now, going on seven. I've had hardly any issues and certainly none of consequence with Arch. Being able to use the AUR without holding my breath, for fear something will break, has been great.
Arch is quick, easy to use and solid. Those claiming its an enthusiast's distro might want to look at how far Arch has come. Steamdeck, the gaming platform sold to millions is based on Arch not Debian (which I also use on another laptop and have a lot of time for).
Lots of upside and very little downside, save perhaps the need, for a more accessible forum.
|
Version: current
Rating: 8
Date: 2022-10-27
Votes: 3
|
stable, fast packages to load. Fast and stable system
Easy to resolve conflicts, with lots of information available on the internet
pacman is very good and easy
Only install what is needed
I was positively surprised and keep developing this OS
I installed all the packages I needed
It would be convenient to facilitate the installation and configuration of PHP, Apache, phpmyadmin and MariaDB Server
Samba was very difficult to set up.
not all information available about the configuration of the packages mentioned above is correct
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2022-10-11
Votes: 12
|
It's not for noobs, sure, but it's not LFS either !
Tried it on mon 2009 iMac, never switched back to anything else, replaced Mint with it on my laptop, but I kept Cinnamon as my DE
Sometimes it breaks, but every time was my doing ^_^
Pros:
The rolling release is what I do like about it, but what I prefer is the documentation on the wiki, with gentoo, it's one of the best out there !
The package management and bleeding edge software availability
Cons:
Kernel updates that leads to a reboot every week or so :-)
By the way, I use Arch ;-)
|
Version: current
Rating: 8
Date: 2022-10-06
Votes: 6
|
The only right choice if you don't want your system to install unneeded apps and you wanna have full control over your machine.
If there's a software installed on your system, you must have installed it yourself.
It'd be cool if people had the choice to choose a different init system, but I assume that would require extra work from devs and cause lots of problems.
Pros:
- lightweight. After fresh install you have to install additional programs instead of removing them from your freshly installed system like in Windows 10 or some other linux distros
- community driven
- fast package manager/mirrors (pacman)
- software availability (pacman, AUR, flatpak, snap, appimages)
- pretty good documentation on Archwiki
Cons:
- not good for newbies. It isn't a 'just works' distro. You need to learn some terminal commands to setup your system.
- occasionaly things break after updating so it's good to know how to fix the system using arch-chroot command
- no way to install a different init system than systemd
- no recovery partition or anything like that. You need to have a USB stick with Arch ISO on it to fix your system
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2022-10-05
Votes: 0
|
Sometimes, while I am working, I become distracted by the elegance of Arch Linux. Arch Linux allows for a high degree of customization out of the gate, while pacman (+AUR) provides automatic dependency resolution and support for the unfortunate proprietary blobs and software that (for now) some of us must still use. From the moment you boot into the installer, you are forced to make deliberate choices for your system. The reward for your labour is becoming a more adept Linux user, with a customized system. I use GNU/Linux because when I otherwise use proprietary software, within seconds I become enraged by these non-free systems with deliberately programmed barriers to functionality and customization. Arch takes the logic of GNU/Linux and carries it to a golden mean between extreme customization and easy maintenance.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2022-09-24
Votes: 14
|
I use Arch since 2005.
It's my daily basis distro at home and at work.
From my experience and point of view Arch is way underrated by DW ranking contributors.
As a rolling release I don't need to worry about version nor to planify a migration.
As a rolling release one may argue or complain that things may break at each update ... I had to manually
intervene only 3 times in 17 years!
Living with a bleeding edge rolling release distribution such as Arch is a way to go for me!
I would rate it 11 but : a) DW don't permit it and b) ... well I miss sysvinit.
Keep up the great job and long life to Arch!
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2022-09-14
Votes: 13
|
A formidably configurable distro that never does hand-holding. Which means you are expected to read the (up-to-date) wiki and manpages, and apply good judgment instead of accepting given settings.
Boot time, both during initial OS and desktop environment loading, is blazing fast.
Firmware support (e.g., brand-new WiFi devices) is great, even on the install environment (which is just a Zsh shell). Their approach to proprietary firmware is quite reasonable.
Package groups and metapackages like gnome, base-devel, texlive-most (i.e., packages supposed to be shipped together) simplify things. Their package policy (e.g., all of OpenSSL in a package named openssl, instead of client, server, etc. in separate ones) makes sense.
Also, daemons aren't enable by default on systemd (which can be changed to runit, sysvinit, etc.). Except for the official wiki docs, you are on your own in terms of what is needed for a usable system.
|
Version: 2011.08.19
Rating: 10
Date: 2022-09-05
Votes: 6
|
My distro of choice had been Debian since Debian 4.0 (Etch) was released in 2007 with its graphical installer. It was the only distro which did all the things I wanted in a fuss-free way.
Like many readers I have evaluated a large number of distros and tried Arch some years ago.
For several releases of Arch I used the Anarchy installer and at times the Archfi installer script.
Since the installer was packaged with Arch it has been much smoother and quicker.
Arch is very fast. It boots quickly and shuts down quickly. Many distros shut down quickly now, usually within 2 seconds and Arch is among the crowd.
It would be nice to have a GUI package manager installed by default but I installed yay and octopi without much ado.
Once I got the hang of installing programs from the command line it was straighforward, eg:
sudo pacman -S sane
sudo pacman -S simple-scan
sudo pacman -S haruna
Arch pips Debian by having the most up-to-date kernel with 5.19.6-arch1-1 at the time of writing.
Having the ability to run commands in Arch as root or as a user instead of the dreadful sudo is a plus point on my checklist.
The vast repository of available packages has not disappointed.
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2022-09-04
Votes: 2
|
I had installed Linux the first time end of 1992 (out of curiosity). Actually back that time it was nearly unusable due to the lack of applications.
That very much remained Linux' fate for some more years: ever tested - ever failed to find it usable for that very reason.
Finally completely switched to Linux in 2005 - that was Ubuntu. Since then I had (private and business) encounters with SuSE, Debian, Gentoo, Ubuntu, RedHat, Mint, Manjaro and MX.
When I installed Arch the first time in about 2015, I felt so incredibly much at home that I immediately dumped my main Linux and decided to stay with Arch - once and for all.
Never ever had any regrets - Arch is undoubtedly the distro for connaisseurs.
+
unbloated
always up-to-date
close-to-perfect packet manager
not build on top of another distro, which in turn is based on another distro, which... (you got the idea)
own (easy) packet creation and installation
quick response concerning bug and security fixes
easy system installation scripting
unlimited customization features
unbelievably good wiki and forums (the English ones, at least)
perfect choice for work, as the OS does not get in the way
-
requires at least some familiarity with Linux as such
rare occasions of packet installations colliding
if an update breaks, it is usually based on some proprietary stuff, not the distro itself
|
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2022-09-02
Votes: 0
|
I own many computers, all running different distros, and have used linux for a total of 5 years. I loved trying out hundreds of distros, from niche to popular ones. I have come to conclude that this is forever going to remain the distro for my main PC that I use for gaming. Love arch for desktop PCs, hate it on laptops. I used to install kubuntu for friends looking to slowly leave windows, but ubuntus tend to give me a headache doing IT support for, so now I simply force all my friends to get arch day 1 and it really is not nearly as hard as the internet claims for newbies to learn. With that in mind, I would not suggest arch if you are learning it all alone. The reason I and my many friends learn to adapt to it so fast is because I am the wife of a massive arch fanatic, have a few irl friends who used arch for a decade, and I enjoy helping others learn how to use it post installation. It is also the easiest thing for me to tech support.
I am very paranoid and a bit lazy so I tend to tell everyone who is a beginner to never install anything from AUR unless it is some game emulator, bashtop, some well known other software like balena etcher, etc. I would suggest carefully think and research before you install a specific AUR package, because blindly getting tons of niche AUR software is the reason my arch used to constantly break. Nvidia gpus also used to mess up my arch, so I have since moved onto AMD with 0 problems since I switched. If you plan to use this for music production, except to get Renoise, otherwise you can try fruity loops but it might be tiring to get to work. Beginners can also consider trying out Garuda, something I left due to it one day getting an update that broke all my games, or Endeavor, both of which are arch based. Use GUI arch installer if you want regular arch itself.
My favorite feature is using yay via terminal to install literally any program I might ever need. It is much easier than any debian or ubuntu based distro I used in the past. And of course, this is the number one distro for gaming. Every single out of my 500 steam games run perfectly except for games that come with EAC. Remember to use arch wiki, think before you install things, watch YT videos about arch, and you should learn it fast. Arch really is not as hard as it seems so long as you do not enter random obscure commands into your terminal. This is the only distro I will be giving a 10 out of 10 rating on here.
Main cons
>if you are learning alone, be ready to binge a lot of videos or read the wiki, but if you will only use arch with steam, telegram, krita, some emulators, this will not be an issue you should worry about.
>if you need a lot of niche software from AUR, be ready to risk breaking your system
Mains pros
>so much easier to install popular software
>flexible
>comfortable
>always modern, up to date
>little to not bloat
>amazing choice for gaming
|
|
Latest Reviews
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-08-05
Votes: 22
|
Arch, for me, feels like a builders take on Linux. You start from scratch and build precisely what you want. Like any good structure common sense is needed to make sure it keeps standing. Choosing a limited range of quality materials, staying away from over utilising the AUR. Making sure your choice of software is minimalist and essential with a solid sensible kernel. Then back everything up and make sure you limit upgrades to maybe twice a month.
I have taken this approach. Arch has been as solid Debian with, in my view, better use of more contemporary packages. Its especially good on newer hardware, in a way other flavours of Linux don't come close to.
One word of caution, this is not for conventional users. You must be prepared to put in real effort. Also I'd recommend steering clear of derivatives. I have yet to come across a single one that is more reliable than pure Arch implemented correctly. Indeed some derivatives break the rule of simplicity that defines Arch, which is why they become unstable. Not nonsense about the "bleeding edge". Arch is not bleeding edge, unless you are reckless enough to make it so.
In short, If you are hard working, gain a sense of accomplishment from learning and developing your system your way, you will I suspect quickly come to appreciate just how fantastic Arch can be.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2024-08-01
Votes: 6
|
I've learned more about linux with Arch than any other distro, and I started fiddling with linux in the mid 90's. Being in an windows enterprise environment for all of my carreer, I've always had only enough linux knowledge to barely get by. Retired now, and despising windows Spyware, I started heavily getting into linux about 3 years ago. Arch specifically, about a year ago. It's been a wild ride!
It's gotten to the point that I pretty much won't install any "derivative distros" anymore. Pretty much only Arch and Debian. Rocky being the exception because of what IBM / Red Hat did to Centos.... that said I use Debian mainly for Servers, and Arch for desktops and vms running different DE's or WMs.
Pros:
1. Rolling Release - People question the stability, but I like it better than hoping "LTS upgrades" won't break stuff, and I also install very few AUR packages (on my main system... VMs are a different story). Technically it is also more secure to keep up on latest packages. With zero to few AUR packages, the stability is absolutely fine.
2. The DIY approach and Archwiki - The easiest way to actually LEARN linux. Gentoo and Linux From Scratch are great, but take too long due to compiling. So, Arch is better if you don't want to get into the weeds about learning how to complie source. I'm a systems guy, not a developer, so compiling holds little interest for me, and I want to avoid it if possible. Obviously git packages mostly need to be compiled (like paru), but that's a minimal need to complie.
3. The AUR - Pretty much haven't found a package that isn't on the AUR, and the few that aren't are on Flathub or Git. IMO, a much better approach with an AUR wrapper than, say, adding repos in Debian just to get a specific package. Again, a majority of my AUR installs are on VMs via qemu / virt manager, or on my proxmox server.
Cons:
1. Some packages in AUR aren't maintaned quick enough and break when updating. However, this also presents an opporunity to LEARN how to fix it or work around it.
2. Some package in the main repository gets depreciated or changed, usually breaks one or more AUR packages. Again, an opporunity to LEARN how to fix it or work around it.
3. The Archinstall script (if you use it) often breaks on older ISO images. Even if you try to update the script and mirrors, often there are times when weird things happen on the install... so, it's just easier to get the latest monthly ISO and run the script that came on it.
4. Stock US mirrors for install are fairly slow in my area. I have to run reflector before installing, - easily saving 2/3'ds the time to download the packages for install, even though reflector takes a couple minutes to grab the fastest mirrors.
So, if you really want to learn linux (without compiling), Arch is the way to go!
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2024-07-21
Votes: 4
|
Coming from Fedora (personal use) and RHEL (work), I can honestly say that this OS is by far the best Linux distro I have ever used.
I don't care for pretty UIs or gaming support. All I care for is that it fast to install, packages are fast to install, updates are fast to install, the overall OS look and feel is faster than anything I've ever tried except maybe FreeBSD.
I will not be ditching RHEL or its clones for work, but I am switching away from Fedora for personal use.
In the past, I trialled Ubuntu and other Debian clones, but they're all slow and clunky compared to Arch.
I wish the package manager was a bit more robust, but I have yet to scratch the surface of this OS and its innards.
It was a breeze to install on an AMD Ryzen with Radeon Graphics, and intel LAN.
Bluetooth works out of the box, you need to use systemctl to enable it, but it's no biggie.
I picked UFW over firewallD to keep things simple. I also picked Gnome over KDE for simplicity as well.
1Password works flawless on it, and that makes me happy. It's usually a pain to set up on other distros.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-07-17
Votes: 5
|
Arrived with Antergos and now using Arch for over 10 years happily.
I am always convenient on the newest software and with the aur this distro is capable of everything, where others lack support in some cases.
Seldom I have to reinstall, but I'm always prepared for it. In the most cases the system can be repaired easily with the installer image. You know that can happen when you do wild downgrades or tinkering with the system. It never breaks unexpected.
When upgrading to KDE Plasma 6, I needed a new graphics card. That was a rare thing of a drawback of rolling releases. Only update when you may have time to fix it. You will not often need it.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-06-25
Votes: 1
|
Daily driving you!
Thank you Arch for learning me so much about so many aspects of Linux. :)
And yup, other people call it difficult. Or they don't like the terminal/shell. It's not for everyone.
That's fine though!
But for me it's simply a need to have a system that gives me so much room to customize it all myself.
It does that job perfectly. While it does still very much those things that it needs to do. Package manager is really great and simple to use.
Arch wiki is probably the best Linux related piece of documentation on the internet. Especially on how easy to use and read it is. It's very important here.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 8
Date: 2024-06-25
Votes: 1
|
I'm using Arch for 6 months in a notebook, and the hardware is modern, but weak and I have only 4gb DDR4 ram I wanted something lighter so it does not feel lagging or freezes so I searched for minimal installs, many of them do not have so much packages to work with, some are very good, but it is not so light so I used a minimal install and put some Window manager it does not freeze at all in a i3wm, when it does is because of many tabs in the browser like 10 or YouTube interface who slow down a lot, other videos run better and if is just the file it's flawless.
Using Wayland I notices lagging in animations and memory consumption, also I need to install a polkit agent to work in some Window managers that I used, because it would not start the interface without specially if is Wayland. Another fix is see if the groups that the user is alright in both polkit and seat in case it does not work.
The AUR is a good resource of good applications, but be careful and do not install too much as it can make the system instable as it is not endorsed by arch to work in the system.
The community is very smart and the edgy culture of Arch seem to attract a lot of brilliant people, but they can be somewhat harsh with newbies or assume everybody knew something that feels unhelpful for learning. But their wiki are great even in other distros I use their orientation.
PS: Arch have a way to do not install everything manually first you connect to the internet and test if it's working with the ping command set keyboard layout and insert 'archinstall'
I do not know that so looking at the manual install made me lazy even knowing who to do it, and postponed my installation, but after testing I become more aware of the customization and installed manually to test the differences.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-06-17
Votes: 0
|
Its a great and exhausting experience. Firstly because you create your OS to your liking but you have to create your OS to your liking. There is no way around it. Even the archinstall script is broken so you have to help it work by manually downloading the archlinux-keyring. But after that not so fun experience you most likely set up an desktop enviroment. Then BOOM ! You will feel a sense of Superiority towards Ubuntu users. In your new System on a clean stake. You go to flatpack and the terminal and pacman and install your stuff your like and setup yay for the AUR. Did i mention the AUR ??? The AUR has what you need, no matter how absurdly obscure. Its like after the post installation steps you have a project and godly toolkit and a manual and help telephone at your desposal. The Wiki no matter into what you do on Linux you will find it in the Arch Wiki its almost a Law of Nature Newton would have find out the moment he gut stuck in the installation because of no Wlan configured. Youll keep wanting to learn more and more. You want to customize more and more. You will make your to your liking tailored OS your Bestfriend till you brick it. Yes Arch is not quite easy to understand but the moment, it ticks ? Youll feel like god like controling everything your PC does, no you actually control everything it does. Every Issues will be a lesson and a test of your humility even when the Arch Superiority complex hits in. You will grow through the pain of Arch. The moment you question something stupid and get ripped to shreds by Pros, youll be motivated to learn more to actually help newbies till you actually become one of the bullies lol. Its the natural Evolution of a Arch user. Arch is the perfect distro for everything. It will become a part of your personality that elitism. I have only used Arch for a week now and have started to sherd newbies on questions after only wasting 8 hours a day for that entire week learning Arch Linux. But most importantly you can say that you use Arch, btw.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-06-10
Votes: 1
|
I'm pretty new to Linux in general since Windows 10 support is ending next year and I have no interest in buying new hardware just to meet Windows 11 requirements. I have a couple months experience after some modest distro hopping (started with Debian, then Endeavour then finally just went to mainline Arch because EOS is really just Arch anyway with a prettier installer). I'm not sure I have much else to add that hasn't already been said about Arch. It's a fantastic operating system. Pacman is fantastic, the documentation is fantastic, and you always have access to the latest and greatest software from the Arch Repo. Most importantly for me is it's a very light install with zero software bloat so I get to choose what I want on my system.
The reputation of Arch proceeds itself, and it is absolutely ABSOLUTELY worth trying. I would like to clear up a couple big misconceptions about Arch though, at least based on my experiences being new to this stuff. First, Arch isn't as unstable as some critics make it out to be. Arch hasn't given me any problems whatsoever so far but I also don't really use the AUR a whole lot. I don't really install a whole lot of stuff any way and I don't have the smarts to be able to properly vet the AUR packages or understand what is in the build scripts. So I just opt to not use AUR unless it's from the developer themselves and only as a last resort for something I really need. If what I need isn't in the Arch repo, I tend to prefer flatpaks over the AUR since I like the containerized packages. I think that if you're using Arch as a daily driver and you don't carelessly overuse the AUR, then problems should be fairly rare.
The second thing people always talk about is the installer. Well there's a dirty little secret.. the live iso actually comes with a fantastic installer script so you don't really have to do a manual install unless you really wanted to. Just type archinstall in the live iso prompt and then follow the steps. So if you're worried about the installation being as hard as people say, don't worry! archinstall is just as easy to use as any calamares installer, but minus the pretty gui. I was up and running in Arch in about ~20 mins or so.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-05-29
Votes: 0
|
Arch Linux is a minimalist, lightweight, and highly customizable Linux distribution known for its simplicity, flexibility, and adherence to the "Keep It Simple, Stupid" (KISS) principle. Unlike many other distributions, Arch Linux follows a rolling release model, meaning that there are no distinct version releases; instead, the system is continuously updated with the latest software packages and updates.
One of the defining features of Arch Linux is its simplicity. The installation process, while not as user-friendly as some other distributions, provides users with complete control over every aspect of their system. Arch Linux installs only the essential components, allowing users to build their system from the ground up, tailored to their specific needs and preferences. This minimalistic approach ensures that the system remains lean, fast, and free of unnecessary bloat.
Another advantage of Arch Linux is its extensive package repository, known as the Arch User Repository (AUR). The AUR is a community-driven repository that contains thousands of additional packages not available in the official repositories. This vast collection of software allows users to easily install and manage applications, tools, and utilities, further enhancing the flexibility and functionality of the system.
Arch Linux also boasts a dedicated and knowledgeable community of users and developers who provide extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources. The Arch Wiki, in particular, is an invaluable source of information for users at all skill levels, offering detailed guides, troubleshooting tips, and best practices for configuring and optimizing the system.
Additionally, Arch Linux offers bleeding-edge software updates, ensuring that users have access to the latest features, improvements, and security patches. This focus on cutting-edge technology makes Arch Linux an attractive choice for enthusiasts, developers, and power users who value staying ahead of the curve and having access to the most up-to-date software.
In summary, Arch Linux's simplicity, flexibility, extensive package repository, active community support, and commitment to providing the latest software updates make it an excellent choice for users seeking a lightweight, customizable, and cutting-edge Linux distribution.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-05-18
Votes: 0
|
Arch Linux is a powerful and highly customizable Linux distribution known for its simplicity and minimalism. It follows the KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) philosophy, which means it aims to provide a clean, straightforward base system that users can build upon according to their specific needs. This makes Arch ideal for experienced Linux users who prefer to configure their systems from the ground up, choosing only the components they require.
One of Arch Linux's standout features is its rolling release model. This approach ensures that users always have access to the latest software updates and system improvements without needing to upgrade to a new version of the operating system periodically. This continuous update process is facilitated by the Arch User Repository (AUR), a community-driven repository that provides a vast array of software packages, often more than official repositories of other distributions.
However, Arch Linux's appeal comes with a steep learning curve. The installation process is entirely manual, requiring users to partition their disks, configure network settings, and install essential software packages from the command line. This can be daunting for beginners but is rewarding for those who invest the time to learn. The extensive Arch Wiki is a valuable resource, providing comprehensive documentation and troubleshooting advice.
In conclusion, Arch Linux offers a highly flexible and cutting-edge environment for users who are comfortable with hands-on system management. Its rolling release model and extensive community support make it a compelling choice for those seeking a customizable and up-to-date Linux experience. However, its manual setup process and maintenance requirements mean it is best suited for advanced users who enjoy the challenge of configuring their operating system to their exact specifications.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 4
Date: 2024-05-18
Votes: 7
|
Arch has its many advantages - namely, new software, great customisability, no random bloatware and a good cmd line. Despite this, its repos (not AUR) are quite stable (unless you use testing, which is marked unstable). Some of the common AUR packages are stable, but I've run into many packages that aren't maintained anymore or lag significantly behind their upstreams.
While the ArchWiki is quite well-informed on a number of topics, it's often lacking in areas that are rather niche (the sort of thing you'd use a wiki for, especially if you were, you know, trying to make the most use of that customisability). Its bleeding-edge update cycle often leaves you with no way to handle old software. It also forces you to use only the package manager to install a number of languages' packages - for instance, Python. So, if the Python package you're looking for isn't in the repos or the AUR, you'll have to start trying workarounds. (PyTorch is not in anything, and you will have to use conda to die trying to get it, and you can't use the older versions.)
Arch doesn't hold your hand and doesn't know what that means, but will bite you with updates requiring you to stay informed about what's going on with the distro's package management. The Archlinux install is unnecessarily difficult due to inconsistencies inside the wiki itself if you're trying to use anything other than the standard setup (/, /boot and swap partitions).
Overall: Works if you aren't really a developer ig. If you need a Linux that breaks once in a while and supports a lot of software (arguably erratically), then you might want to give it a spin. One of the most customizable Linuxes out there, but unless you want to spend a lot of time customising and very little time using said setup, perhaps give this distro a miss.
PS: used this for a decade and it worked alright when I wasn't using it for dev or customising it much.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2024-05-03
Votes: 1
|
Arch is a great distro for the desktop if you are ok learning how to do things from a command line. While you totally can use a gui for whatever you want, Arch is designed to teach you Linux admin skills and how to configure and run your system from the command line. The resulting power and control over your system is addictive. It's like the manual transmission in a car, hard to learn but gives you way more power and control once you master it.
For a server distro, Arch tends to update too often to make a usable production server in a work environment. For a personal server, it works fine. I use Radicale to sync my contacts and calendars across all my devices and I use ReadyMedia/MiniDLNA on the same machine (my main desktop) as a DLNA server for my media files.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-04-24
Votes: 1
|
As a long-time user of Arch Linux, I can confidently say that this distribution has become my go-to choice for the majority of my computing needs. The level of customization and control that Arch Linux provides is unparalleled, allowing me to tailor my system to my exact preferences and requirements. Over the years, I've grown so accustomed to the Arch Linux ecosystem that whenever I find myself in a situation where I'm required to use another distribution, I immediately seek out ways to bring a piece of Arch with me. This is where tools like JuNest come in handy, enabling me to continue using my beloved package manager, pacman, and tap into the vast resources of the Arch User Repository, regardless of the underlying operating system.
One of the most remarkable aspects of Arch Linux is its ability to make even the most unconventional tasks surprisingly straightforward. This is largely due to the exceptional quality and depth of the Arch Wiki, a treasure trove of knowledge that covers virtually every aspect of the distribution. Whether you're a seasoned veteran or a curious newcomer, the Arch Wiki is an invaluable resource that guides you through the intricacies of the system, providing clear, concise, and up-to-date information on a wide range of topics.
Moreover, the Arch Linux community is a true gem, comprised of passionate and knowledgeable individuals who are always ready to lend a helping hand. The level of support and camaraderie within the Arch community is truly remarkable, fostering an environment where users can learn, grow, and contribute to the ongoing development and improvement of the distribution. It's this sense of belonging and shared purpose that makes Arch Linux not just an operating system, but a thriving ecosystem that continues to attract and inspire users from all walks of life.
In conclusion, if I were to choose a single operating system to accompany me into the afterlife, there's no doubt in my mind that it would be Arch Linux. Its unparalleled flexibility, comprehensive documentation, and vibrant community make it the ultimate choice for those who value control, customization, and the joy of learning. Arch Linux is more than just a distribution; it's a way of life, and I'm proud to be a part of this incredible journey.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-04-23
Votes: 1
|
Arch is one of those systems that grows on you even if you go in being apprehensive and just want to "check it out".
I did just that, installed it to check it out and a year later my urge to try other distros has diminished greatly.
Arch is fast, it's cutting edge, it's stable, it's as complex or as simplistic as you want to make it, it has an awesome package manager with parallel downloads and a few other tricks up it's sleeve and most of all it's a rolling release. Their documentation is probably one of the best out there. Without going into too many details, I've been using Linux as my daily driver since early 2000's and I've tried every distro under the sun, including the BSD's. I like many different ones for different reasons, but all in all I feel pretty cozy with Arch fulfilling my daily needs and keeping me on the bleeding edge of the Linux kernel and GNU software ecosystem. Thank you Arch devs for all of your hard work, this truly is one of the best Linux distributions in present times and it only keeps getting better.
I hope more people are willing to give it a go and discover how truly awesome Arch Linux can be.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2024-04-19
Votes: 0
|
Love Arch! Its package manager is fast, and it offers modern packages. It's a fun distro for sure, though the usual caveats like upstream bugs and occasional instability apply. Pacman is a very fast package manager – the fastest I've tried. The installation isn't that difficult once you understand how it works, and you can probably learn it in a few days. I wouldn't recommend the archinstall script because it's prone to bugs and detracts from the true Arch experience. Also, if you select the btrfs option within the script, it sets up the filesystem incorrectly without subvolumes, leaving you with more work later. Stick to the old manual installation because it's likely faster than using the buggy archinstall script.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 5
Date: 2024-04-12
Votes: 1
|
I did not managed to install Arch Linux with archinstall install script shortly after the initial release of Plasma 6 at the end of february with the March iso because the script tried to pull an obsolete package and would crash with errors because of that. This left me with an incomplete Arch install. I believe this was fixed in the archinstall script with the April release of the iso but it was a painful experience for me. So for an incomplete Arch install I've experienced I'm going to give it a 5. You can skip the archinstall script and install Arch totally manually but since the script is there: please be sure to maintain it more frequently.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-03-31
Votes: 0
|
Perfection! Awesome community, no bloatware... fresh air!
You can learn base of Linux while installing it manually, you'll get better understanding about how Linux system works.
Also you can install packages not in Arch pacman repo with AUR apps like yay or paru. It's really helpful if you want to install a package in github. Rolling release is awesome, you'll get latest updates asap. I recommend using Arch with WM instead of DE, but it's preference after all. If you're new here, looking for a good distro to use... I definitely recommend Arch, also I recommend you to take a look at WM (Window Manager) term. You can take a look at reddit unixporn subreddit, there are a lot of good customizations, also config files... I mean, just search it. And lastly but not least... most of websites running Linux on background and today is sunny so I use Arch btw.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-03-21
Votes: 0
|
Arch Linux: A Playground for Power Users
Arch Linux isn't your average distro. It's a breath of fresh air for those who crave bleeding-edge software, a customizable experience, and a deep dive into the Linux underbelly. But before you dive in, be prepared for a challenge.
Strengths:
Unmatched Customization: Arch gives you a blank slate. You pick the desktop environment (KDE, GNOME, XFCE, you name it) and meticulously craft your system to fit your needs. Package management with Pacman is a breeze.
Rolling Release: Say goodbye to bulky updates. Arch constantly delivers the latest software, keeping your system on the cutting edge.
Lightweight and Efficient: A base Arch install is remarkably lean, making it a great choice for older machines or those who value responsiveness.
Superb Wiki: Arch is famous for its comprehensive Wiki, a treasure trove of knowledge that acts as your guide and troubleshooting companion. The helpful Arch community is another plus.
Challenges to Consider:
Steep Learning Curve: Arch is for users comfortable with the command line. Installation itself is a hands-on experience that forces you to learn.
DIY Troubleshooting: Expect to spend more time tinkering than with user-friendly distros. While rewarding, it's not for everyone.
Not for the Faint of Heart: A broken system due to a configuration error can be daunting for beginners. Backups are essential.
Who Should Try Arch?
Linux Enthusiasts: If you want to understand Linux inside-out and relish the challenge of building your perfect system, Arch is your playground.
Advanced Users: Power users who crave customization and bleeding-edge software will find Arch an empowering choice.
Those Willing to Learn: If you're comfortable with the command line and enjoy troubleshooting, Arch offers a rewarding learning experience.
The Verdict:
Arch Linux is a fantastic distro for experienced users and those willing to learn. Its unmatched customization, cutting-edge software, and lightweight nature make it a compelling choice. However, its DIY approach and steeper learning curve make it less suitable for beginners. If you're up for the challenge, Arch offers a gateway to a deeper understanding and control of your Linux system.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-03-18
Votes: 0
|
Stable and easy to use. Ever since I've started using Arch, I have attracted more potiential dates, however now the local dogs look at me funny. Strong package ecosystem and easy to maintain. No frills. Used for server, media, desktop, and laptop without issues. Using full KDE software suite and both wayland and X11, both PulseAudio and Pipewire -- no issues with either. Works fine with complicated network specifications or AV input configurations without issue. Versitile tool that stays out of the way. Does what you program it to do. You have to accept that you need to understand what you're doing to install it in a secure configuration, then do it because ever since using I started using Arch my bank manager calls me daily thanking me profusely.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-03-17
Votes: 2
|
I came here and expected breakage and issues - that I would have been really happy to deal with, I kinda was promised problems.
Turns out, even on testing branch there are absolutely no issues, even the Plasma 6 release was smooth sailing. Might differ if you need to rely on proprietary crap due to your hardware choices but on open source drivers, all runs well.
The installation process is kinda troublesome but the guided installer or alternative installation methods really make that a non-issue.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 1
Date: 2024-03-16
Votes: 1
|
So bleeding edge, we got kde6 before neon. How do I feel being a kde test dummy? Not good man. Wayland makes sure I question all my software. No more window shading or color pickers. At least you can log in to an x session :) No more autodisable touchpad when a mouse is detected. panel icons missing (a lot, using oxygen, the REAL only one lol). Hold on, crash.....ok back. Man, plasma updates buggier than networkmanager. Skanlite still holds record as WAE. Wallpaper still not random. Persistant tooltips, ripped tooltips,useless tooltips (but they got transparencey "/)
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-03-14
Votes: 4
|
After KDE Plasma 6 fell on its face I've did a fresh install moving over to Cinnamon desktop (which I find the most stable). I did try another Arch derivative out of curiosity briefly but nothing comes close to pure Arch. Its simply the most stable OS of its kind, beating out any derivatives I've come across.
Yes a GUI is not there by default but I've become so accustomed now to using the command line to install and configure the OS, not using it feels, oddly, uncomfortable. The command line gives you so much flexibility and puts you in control and better still, it makes you think, so you are very aware of what you are doing.
I keep circling back to Arch and I think there is little chance I'll be going anywhere else. So good in every sense.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2024-03-10
Votes: 2
|
Update to Plasma-6 libs (9.03.24) has broken something again. Now on my dark themed LXQt Kate do not use manually defined icons, so i got dark icons on dark theme. Kdialog stopped using system's theme at all. Predefined systems fonts sizes was reseted to 8 pt, and so on. Previous update of dbus makes system unusable because dbus-broker cannot work with turned off some systemd services. Year ago, afrer Blender update it stoped to work on my system because Blender 4.x requires cpu with sse4.2 that is a x86-64-v2 specs while Arch linux officially runs on x86-64 (i.e. v1). I have noticed updates install more and more dependencies, so bloatedfree distro is more or less questionable now. It is not like i am trying to blame Arch linux. This are what i have noticed recently. Earlier, as i remember it was more stable, at least i did not needed to finish journey of fixing something after almost each update. I have dropped ubuntu/kubuntu years ago bacause of same reasons. Now i am thinking again of less wasted time distro.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-03-05
Votes: 7
|
The freedom embodied in Arch Linux is a testament to the philosophy of simplicity, transparency, and user empowerment. Arch Linux embraces the concept of minimalism, providing users with a bare-bones system that allows for unparalleled customization and control over their computing environment. This distribution adheres to the Arch Way, emphasizing simplicity in design and a do-it-yourself ethos. Users have the freedom to choose and configure every aspect of their system, from the choice of desktop environment to the selection of software packages. Arch Linux's rolling release model ensures that users have access to the latest software updates and features, granting them the freedom to stay on the cutting edge of technology. With Arch, freedom extends beyond the software itself; it's a mindset that encourages users to actively participate in the shaping of their computing experience, fostering a community-driven ecosystem that celebrates individuality and innovation.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-02-25
Votes: 62
|
the best distribution. Only the installation process is bad.
For that, I use EndeavourOS.
The process is simple:
EndeavourOS uses the Arch repo's with some QoL packages in their own repository.
They use KDE Plasma, systemd-boot and dracut by default - also my personal choice.
1. Install EndeavourOS
2. Remove the endeavouros - repo from /etc/pacman.conf
3. Run yay
4. Remove the 10 or so packages that yay lists as "Packages not in AUR"
5. Reinstall lsb-release and filesystem packages with sudo pacman -S lsb-release filesystem (Now your system identifies itself as Arch)
6. Run sudo reinstall-kernels (Now the systemd-boot configs also say Arch instead of EndeavourOS)
7. Check the KDE System settings for possible missing themes/colors and set them to Breeze defaults
8. Reboot your freshly installed Arch system.
Congratulations, you have set up a fully functional Arch system with KDE Plasma in under 30 minutes (depending on your Internet connection)
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-02-14
Votes: 8
|
OS: Arch Linux x86_64
Kernel: 6.6.16-1-lts
Packages: (pacman)
Shell: bash 5.2.26
WM: Openbox
WM Theme: Nightmare
Theme: Yaru-viridian-dark [GTK2/3]
Icons: Yaru-viridian-dark [GTK2/3]
Terminal: gnome-terminal
The Best!!!
No comparison!
Very gentle, simple, smart and wise.
Whatever You want is possible!
Just do everything you want and that's it!
Every time the newest packages.
A huge number of packages.
AUR/YAY.
Almost 3 years using nearby other Linux distroes...
No problems at all!
I'd recommend it to everybody!
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-02-06
Votes: 19
|
Having used Arch now for some years I am still happy with my decision. I would not describe myself as a linux expert. Many nerds would recommend Ubuntu or Mint to me. I tried them of course. But sooner or later those distros broke if I installed something special. And it is hard to say it. Often more painful than Windows in this respect. Centos was much older from its packages but better in stability and performance. And a lot more stable than Windows. So I was back in Linux again. But Centos disappeared after Redhat was purchased by IBM.
After that I gave Rolling Distros a trial because I was not willing to set up my system every 1 or 2 years any more. Tumbleweed was surprinsingly good in performance on my old machines but buggy as Fedora. Really frustrated I even thought about returning back to Windows. But I decided to try Arch. What a clever decision in the end. The installation was a nightmare but managable with the very, very good wikis. After that I never looked back and had absolutely no issues. I am using KDE Plasma. I guess its more than 3 years now with not a single system crash even with a lot of photo editing. Windows crashed 20x minimum in the same time.
Last year I thought I could ruin Arch because I did not update it for half a year. If you do that with Suse Tumbleweed or Debian Sid it will most likely break your system latest after the reboot. Not so with Arch. Absolutely no issues. Pacman is a gem.
When my last windows PC will retire because of Win 10 end of support I will switch it to Arch as well. Systemwise it always was a no brainer. And I am not willing to throw such a fine machine like a HP 8570W to dustbin because Windows 11 is not supporting it and creating us users painful experiences with TPM 2.0 or the potential loss of software or security updates in future.
And linux software has definitely it's advantages over the MS and Mac-World. I hate the new subscription concepts of MS Office, Adobe & Co. companies. Their software might not be bad. But I don't see a huge value of them over the free linux alternatives like LibreOffice, Darktable, Digicam and so on.
The most fascinating experience is that Arch did not loose in performance over the years. It feels snappier than other distros from the first day.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-27
Votes: 13
|
Having daily driven Aptitude-based Linux distributions for years, I decided it was time to move onto better things, and found that Arch had exactly what I wanted that Debian lacked: up-to-date packaging, managed by one of the most intuitive package managers (Pacman).
I also like that I can use the AUR if a package isn't available from Arch officially, which, when combined together, towers over Debian. Not to mention the fact that the Arch Wiki can even apply to distros outside of Arch. It is so well-written and constantly updated for accuracy. Only OpenBSD's manpages rival it, and that's saying a lot.
As it is a rolling release, you do have to use some common sense when applying upgrades. Normally, I wait at least a week before doing an update, which accompanies the routine system backups (which are absolutely important to have, regardless of distro or skill level).
Arch really is amazing all-around.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-26
Votes: 9
|
I migrated from Fedora / CentOS to ArchLinux in 2019 and haven't looked back since then. I started a test migration with my laptop and then moved my desktop and all other computers in the house to ArchLinux.
Fedora and CentOS take too long to provided major version updates to software packages. This is the biggest benefit that I see with Arch and other rolling linux distributions. Although people argue that Arch trades stability for the latest and greatest software, I've never experienced this except once with an Nvidia graphics driver bug.
I use Arch in all my production PCs at home and am happy I made the switch!
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-22
Votes: 14
|
I was really terrified by the rumors that Arch Linux way a distro for andvanced users. This Sundey I had plenty of free time so I desided to give it a try.
The ISO:
The ISO is less than a 1G so the download time was really fast.
The installer:
The installer is text-based BUT it has nothing to do with the complex and confusing text-based installers of Debian or Slackware. It is simple and conenient.
It was as easy as calamares.
You can choose the desktop environment you want to use (KDE,Gnome,XFCE,Cinnamon,Sway,I3,etc)
You can choose if you want your system encrypted.
You can choose the sound server (pulseaudio, pipewire)
And of course you can set language, keyboard, partition and user.
The usage:
Arch have the best documentation out there called "Arch Wiki". It is a very educational manual that teaches people how to follow best practices.
Performance:
I used Gnome and I3. Gnome was performing really good. Almost as smooth as SolusOS.
Software:
Literally every Linux app is available in the repositories or the user repository (AUR).
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2024-01-19
Votes: 5
|
Arch is one of those systems that grows on you even if you go in being apprehensive and just want to "check it out".
I did just that, installed it to check it out and a year later my urge to try other distros has diminished greatly.
Arch is fast, it's cutting edge, it's stable, it's as complex or as simplistic as you want to make it, it has an awesome package manager with parallel downloads and a few other tricks up it's sleeve and most of all it's a rolling release. Their documentation is probably one of the best out there. Without going into too many details, I've been using Linux as my daily driver since early 2000's and I've tried every distro under the sun, including the BSD's. I like many different ones for different reasons, but all in all I feel pretty cozy with Arch fulfilling my daily needs and keeping me on the bleeding edge of the Linux kernel and GNU software ecosystem. Thank you Arch devs for all of your hard work, this truly is one of the best Linux distributions in present times and it only keeps getting better.
I hope more people are willing to give it a go and discover how truly awesome Arch Linux can be.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-15
Votes: 6
|
i've been daily driving arch for around 10 months at this point, after switching between Linux mint, Debian and openBSD. After going through the install book. While I have been using Arch it has never broke for me (aside from an issue where I had accidentally installed both pipewire and pulseaudio). While I would recommend something like manually setting up a desktop from a minimalist install, its a pretty good experience.
Pros:
Fast boot speed
Good setup, everything works as expected,
Packages are always up to date.
Everything I want to install is well documented and supported
Gaming works surprisingly well
Cons:
Aur packages are often hit or miss when it comes to installing more obscure things, don't be afraid to use Flatpaks instead
Gpartd on Linux Mint will often refuse to modify my filesystem due to there out of date packages
People can easily forget to deal with pacnew files
All in all, I would recommend this to everyone as there second Linux distro
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-09
Votes: 11
|
At the beginning of December, I picked Arch as my introduction to Linux after twenty-five years on Windows (and a few back way back when on a Macintosh II). I was aware that it wasn't a beginner distro, but I was so badly fed up with everything modern Windows is that Arch's near-opposite philosophy seemed worth some frustration, and life was such that a steep learning curve sounded like an excellent distraction right then.
I have to admit that I'm not sure I'd have managed to get it going without the archinstall script, and definitely not without some embarrassingly basic questions cluttering up their forum. During my first attempts at setting it up on a spare laptop, I got stuck on a problem that I couldn't solve because I couldn't even figure out the right question. (Now I know I'd misunderstood part of the bootloader installation process; six weeks ago I couldn't have told you what a bootloader does.) So I used the script to get the laptop up and running to poke around in; once I was better able to follow the guide and had a better idea of why I might choose one option over another, I reinstalled it, and I've been setting the other computers up manually as well.
I'm finding Arch to be refreshingly straightforward now that the underlying ideas aren't so new; a surprising number of things are so easy to do with the terminal that GUIs are the less user-friendly option for them. Everything's quick and responsive even on the desktop that's been sitting around quarantined as a media archive since the last version of Windows it could run lost support. And it's just plain pleasant to work with; I don't have to fight with somebody else's ideas about what a user's going to want to do and what a user shouldn't tinker with. I don't know how many of these things are Arch-specific and how much are just Linux, but I do know that as soon as the spare laptop was halfway functional, I went a couple of weeks without bothering to start up my usual computer because Arch is such a vast improvement over Windows for everyday use. Maybe it's not a beginner distro, but this beginner is deeply impressed by it.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-05
Votes: 14
|
I have been using Arch for about 10 years now. I enjoy being always up-to-date due to rolling release, Arch's customizability and its light weight. The official package repositories and the AUR contain basically everything one might be looking for and I have found Arch to be incredibly stable despite people claiming it would break all the time.
Its installation procedure might be a bit more difficult without a graphical interface, but Arch is clearly not designed as grandma's first OS. While it is somewhat aimed at advanced users, the Arch wiki has very good articles and instructions, and I would recommend anyone to give it a try at least once. You might fall in love with it just as quickly as I did.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2024-01-03
Votes: 18
|
It would be nice if newbies actually used a distro before writing their personal opinion as a "review". For some reason it seems the most targeted here are Arch and Arch-based distros, which newbies perceive as incredibly easy to break. Truth is, Arch is not fragile at all - in fact, after using Debian and Ubuntu for years, I can say with confidence Arch is extremely stable even though it's a "rolling distro", it has been my daily driver for years now. Fixing issues is way simpler than with Debian, where old packages used to cause me all sorts of dependency problems and headaches... Finally, if you're scared and not interested in learning Linux, feel free to use whatever newbie-oriented distro you want, and stop repeating slogans.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 7
Date: 2023-12-28
Votes: 0
|
I understand the point of using Arch it is highly flexible and customizable you can make it how you desire without bloat, hence I do not hate it. But there is a reason why it is ranked this low for me, simply the system is the most fragile, even though you can do whatever to your system it is a double edged sword (i.e you can break it easily more on accident). I know the Arch wiki exists and thanks to it I have solved many issues but simply the distro isn't for me, I know why you may want to daily drive it the AUR is awesome tbh. But I am sorry Arch, NixOS is more for me.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-12-26
Votes: 4
|
I've been using Arch Linux for about 12 years. While it used to be problematic with almost every update, last few years it has gotten so stable it is almost boring. Sometimes I feel like I'm running Debian Stable, not Rolling Release distro.
Last problem I had with Arch Linux was about month ago. It was problem with NVIDIA drivers which needed some package to be updated but it was still in testing repo so update failed. This was fixed a day or two later since it was holyday.
Last big problem with Arch was so long ago I honestly do not remember when it was.
One odd thing about arch is pacman - it's package manager. Sintax it uses is way different than what other package managers use, but once you get hang of it, it's as simple as any other.
While Arch Linux is not for everyone, I like thinkering with it, and if sucessfully installed, anyone can use it as any other Linux distro.
Salut from Croatia!
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-12-24
Votes: 1
|
Three years using Arch now. I tried putting a more OOTB kind of distro on a laptop "to save time." I had issues with wifi from the start, and its meta-packages created conflicts. Looking for solutions, the Arch wiki was consistently the best source. It ended up being simpler to install Arch than to try to muddle through with the other so-called user friendly distros. While using the other distro, I had to move to the unstable branch to access software that could build the program I needed to use. The unstable branch began to accumulate a list of programs that the package manager would not install. Arch's rolling release provides continually updated access to software, but in my experience, it is stable and doesn't have weird problems that arise from patching together different repositories, branches, or relying on an unstable branch. After these problems, I moved to Arch. It took an evening to set up and configure. Viva Arch!
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-12-21
Votes: 2
|
And again, just come back to Arch and as always it is just a breeze ! A breeze to simply get what you want and it run at the perfection. Pacman is the greatest package manager I've used, the official repos are very populated, many development tools, IDE, etc. With AUR you have the greatest open source packages collection you can find out there. Finally the wiki no longer needs to be presented even if you are not using Arch, it is full of clear and generic Linux information. Arch is one of these distro that make benefit for all.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-12-07
Votes: 0
|
I discovered and started using Linux in 2004. Since then, I have tried and tested several Linux distributions. Arch Linux has become my home. It's no wonder that arch linux became the basis for many linux distributions. The stability (yes, even though it is a roling release), the pacman package manager, the documentation and the large community, the freedom to customize to the user's taste, the learning and the fact that it is a roling release. There are so many qualities that it would take too long to list and explain them all in detail.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-12-01
Votes: 19
|
Excellent distro.
Once installed, you won't want to leave Arch Linux. I followed exactly the instructions for beginners (without the Archinstall script) from the wiki. It didn't work right away, but after three or four tries, Arch Linux with KDE was installed and runs great and without errors. The wiki is excellent, Pacman also runs perfectly. Installing Arch manually in the console is not difficult at all. I also had openSUSE Tumbleweed installed with KDE in the meantime, but I always end up with Arch Linux, now the distro hopping is over, I have found my distribution with Arch Linux, Arch Linux is perfect.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-11-21
Votes: 0
|
The new install script makes not only installing Arch, but customizing it to your exact specifications a complete breeze! No bloatware, no nonsense, just only what you need. Its no longer JUST for Linux/unix experts. Anyone can customize their OS, as long as they know how to go through an automated checklist.
My main complaint is that systemd is mandatory, and there is no good way to swap it out for a different init system. I wish that they had not overlooked that customizability. I assume that they included it because Arch has some dependencies on it. I hope that changes, because having your OS dependent on a single product with a dev team known for their volatility and disregarding community concerns is...not great. Hate that so many OSs have a dependency on it.
That being said, if you are looking for an OS and you are obsessed with customizing like myself, you can hardly go wrong with Arch. It is the OS that I always return to after distrohopping, and the one I recommend towards anyone that truly wants to make their OS their own.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 8
Date: 2023-11-12
Votes: 1
|
If it wasn't for systemd it would have been perfect 10+ but it is being dragged down by IBM-windows-hydra
Limited in scope to those who either understand how a unix/linux system works or those willing to learn and understand. So installation requires a little more learning and reading than most, but once understood it takes minutes without looking at any installation wiki. 3rd parties trying to make an "easier" lazier installer are irresponsible, because installation is the 1st step, and if one was not willing to learn a few things the 2nd step is even more demanding (setup/configuration). So they are a disservice rather than providing help.
The ultimate, fastest, more precise, more flexible package manager and package builder of them all, with really no true competition anywhere in sight.
We wish there was a musl version, and we wish it was officially available for arm64 archs, maybe someday.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-11-08
Votes: 4
|
Once installed, you won't want to leave Arch Linux. I followed exactly the instructions for beginners (without the Archinstall script) from the wiki. It didn't work right away, but after three or four tries, Arch Linux with KDE was installed and runs great and without errors. The wiki is excellent, Pacman also runs perfectly. Installing Arch manually in the console is not difficult at all. I also had openSUSE Tumbleweed installed with KDE in the meantime, but I always end up with Arch Linux, now the distro hopping is over, I have found my distribution with Arch Linux, Arch Linux is perfect.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-10-27
Votes: 7
|
Awesome! i use arch for a few days for user experience with KDE and pacman is very very good.
I install this manually (not using archinstall script) why i installed manually/ if you installing with archinstall you will get chance the file system is corrupt so , better install manually. tip:if you installing manually use cfdisk don't use fdisk (if you use nvme use this command cfdisk /dev/nvme0n1) . you can use custom desktop like XFCE,GNOME,KDE PLASMA,LXQt,MATE,SUGAR,BUDGIE,CINNAMON,LXDE
Keep going archlinux!!!!!!!
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-10-19
Votes: 13
|
It's actually easier than it was a decade ago to create an Arch based distro but things have changed: what I mean by this is that arch iso ships with archinstall which makes the job easy to setup and run arch. I get the best downloading speed with the default mirror. My favorite desktop environment is LXQt. Pipewire is a breeze to have it installed and configured thanks to the archinstall script. I prefer the liquorix (Linux-Zen) kernel over the vanilla default one. An handy thing is to install is informant which prevents updates to be done and packages to be installed as long as you haven't read the Arch News which are very important especially in cases that imply manual interventions. LXQt isn't bloated at all and with openbox as a solid window manager, it's a killer combo. When you look for distros based on project ranking on distrowatch, Arch is the top systemd based distro! Go Arch you won't ever look back ^_^
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 5
Date: 2023-10-17
Votes: 5
|
I use a couple arch based distros all the time and they are terrific. Pacman is superb. I have been using linux since the mid 90's and I decided to give it another go today. I use slackware currently and a few others but mostly slackware. I always laugh when I do a slack install with the graphical selections to setup your system since it's been like that for decades. Yet it works and you are up and cooking in less than a half hour from scratch.
This OS is deliberately a PITA to install, and it shows. I guess it's some sort of initiation ritual based on the community attitude. Command line partitioning and fstab making is cool, great, but it's not necessary for 25 years. Making public knowledge unnecessarily obfuscating does not make it tribal expertise. It makes it difficult to use. I have better things to do.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-10-15
Votes: 11
|
I have run plain old Arch Linux for over 10 years, and Linux in general for much longer. I distro-hopped for about 15 years before trying Arch, and was hooked from then on. Arch, by itself is only a collection of packages, but add in the freedom to make it anything you want, along with the best documentation to be found in *all* of Linuxland, all together earn it a 10.
I haven't strayed from Arch since I started with it. The freedom it offers is unparalleled. I can't go back to Fedora, Debian, or SuSE. The thought of running anything else but Arch is revolting.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 10
Date: 2023-10-09
Votes: 6
|
I've been using Arch Linux for a while now, and I'm relieved that it's been getting better in terms of stability. The past few months have been smooth sailing, with no bootloader hiccups, which used to be a headache in the past..
While I haven't had any problems with Arch's default init system, systemd, I'd love to have runit as an officially supported option. Being able to test it without having to install Artix would be a huge upgrade.
The only small hiccup I've noticed is that Gnome updates take a bit longer to reach the Arch Linux repositories.
|
Project: Arch Linux
Version: current
Rating: 9
Date: 2023-09-28
Votes: 4
|
I've been using Arch on my main laptops for over three years. Its been a better experience than I had expected. Arch is fast, easy to use, if not install and has the AUR with its vast repository of software, that's hard to match. I've had to learn a lot about the command line, using Arch. Yes I've had to trouble shoot issues and not all of them, occasional black screen upon first starting the OS, have gone away, in spite of a lot of time spent on forums.
I do think Arch could do with an automated installer, for those who don't want to be running through things from the command line and I think people need to acknowledge there is maintenance and a few bugs attendant to Arch.
That said, these things are alright as there is a lot of upside too, particularly in terms of gaining independence and being able to set up your Arch OS, as you like as opposed to having a lot of unnecessary software installed by default and having to endure someone else's vision of what your OS should be.
|
|
|
| TUXEDO |
TUXEDO Computers - Linux Hardware in a tailor made suite
Choose from a wide range of laptops and PCs in various sizes and shapes at TUXEDOComputers.com. Every machine comes pre-installed and ready-to-run with Linux. Full 24 months of warranty and lifetime support included!
Learn more about our full service package and all benefits from buying at TUXEDO.
|
| Star Labs |
Star Labs - Laptops built for Linux.
View our range including the highly anticipated StarFighter. Available with coreboot open-source firmware and a choice of Ubuntu, elementary, Manjaro and more. Visit Star Labs for information, to buy and get support.
|
|
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
bc1qxes3k2wq3uqzr074tkwwjmwfe63z70gwzfu4lx 
lnurl1dp68gurn8ghj7ampd3kx2ar0veekzar0wd5xjtnrdakj7tnhv4kxctttdehhwm30d3h82unvwqhhxarpw3jkc7tzw4ex6cfexyfua2nr 
86fA3qPTeQtNb2k1vLwEQaAp3XxkvvvXt69gSG5LGunXXikK9koPWZaRQgfFPBPWhMgXjPjccy9LA9xRFchPWQAnPvxh5Le 
0x969CD4E778C7b6549A2B00e34114e0168c86A542 