Mageia

Reader supplied reviews for Mageia Average rating 8.5 from 112 review(s) What are your thoughts on Mageia? Please include a few pros and a few cons, along with your overall impression of the operating system. Our FAQ page has tips on writing a good mini-review. Version: -- cauldron65.14.1321 Rating:    -- 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 out of 10 Comments (maximum 2,040 characters): Past reviews - sort by: DateVotes Version: 6 Rating: 8 Date: 2018-11-12 Votes: 3 Great, stable and boring distro. If your distro has ideal hardware (that works perfectly with the open-source drivers that come with Mageia), it's a smooth and comfortable enough experience that I believe it is suitable for beginners. If not you'll, of course, experience the usual hiccups, but alas that is life on Linux. I like that now DNF (from Fedora) is available for use as its package manager, along with its old package manager, urpmi. urpmi is one of the most irritating package managers I have used in that its syntax isn't intuitive and I find myself often having to look to its man pages and DuckDuckGo searches for help to do simple tasks with it. Despite this DNF and its graphical tools for package management and system configuration are second to none in terms of user-friendliness, stability and functionality. Its repos aren't huge (not including OpenRA, SageMath and Snap, for example), but thanks to AppImages and Flatpak (which is in its repos) most popular apps you may want are available for it. You can also install Nix (https://nixos.org/nix/) and use it to install certain apps you find aren't available as AppImages and are missing from Mageia and Flatpak's repos. Nix is also helpful for installing apps when you find packages from these other vendors (Mageia repos/Flathub/AppImage devs/etc.) have bugs, as you can install the package with Nix and use it until the bug is fixed. I haven't had the pleasure of interacting with its community or support forums, but I suspect like most open-source projects its community will be warm, welcoming and friendly. Was this review helpful? Yes No Version: 6 Rating: 10 Date: 2018-10-06 Votes: 11 Je m'exprimerait en Français pour cette distribution, Cette continuation de Mandriva a connue des périodes difficiles mais elle à repris du poil de la bête dans cette version 6.1: Pour: -Bonne reconnaissance du matériel. -Communauté active et sympathique -Utilise DNF! -Beaucoup d'environnement graphiques pris en charge, ce qui fait un à avantage par rapport à Fedora (ou si nous sortons de GNOME c'est un peu chaotique) -Un nom, ça peut paraitre étrange mais c'est la descendante directe et la continuation de Mandriva -Stable, Alternative crédible à Debian Contre -Un développement un peu trop lent probablement du au manque de développeurs. Was this review helpful? Yes No Version: 6 Rating: 10 Date: 2018-09-03 Votes: 22 I grew bored of Debian, and was looking for something similar in terms of stability but different with system and package management, Mageia ticks those boxes for me, its RPM based like Fedora and OpenSUSE, but behaves more for me - unlike Fedora - Install is easy, just read the instructions, if you are new to Linux then just read the Mageia guide. The install will take some time as you get to choose what you want in terms of packages (talking of which, when you use the Mageia Control Centre to add or remove packages, it automatically manages dependencies / orphans) and what DE you want. During the install your system will update, meaning that when you have a fresh install there will be no updates needed, quite handy! Mageia is actually quite light on RAM / CPU, and does not cause concern for me for general use, I browse the web, listen to music, and theme to my hearts content, Mageia allows me to do everything that Debian did and provide me with an equally stable platform. IMHO you can't go wrong here. Was this review helpful? Yes No See all 112 reader reviews of Mageia...